Skip Navigation


JAC Advance Access originally published online on September 10, 2009
Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy 2009 64(5):1062-1066; doi:10.1093/jac/dkp326
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Supplementary Data
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
64/5/1062    most recent
dkp326v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Murillo, O.
Right arrow Articles by Ariza, J.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Murillo, O.
Right arrow Articles by Ariza, J.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2009. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the British Society for Antimicrobial Chemotherapy. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Original research

Intracellular antimicrobial activity appearing as a relevant factor in antibiotic efficacy against an experimental foreign-body infection caused by Staphylococcus aureus

O. Murillo1,*, M. E. Pachón1, G. Euba1, R. Verdaguer2, M. Carreras3, C. Cabellos1, J. Cabo4, F. Gudiol1 and J. Ariza1

1 Experimental Infection Laboratory, Infectious Diseases Service, IDIBELL, Hospital Universitari de Bellvitge, Barcelona, Spain 2 Department of Microbiology, IDIBELL, Hospital Universitari de Bellvitge, Barcelona, Spain 3 Department of Pathology, IDIBELL, Hospital Universitari de Bellvitge, Barcelona, Spain 4 Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, IDIBELL, Hospital Universitari de Bellvitge, Barcelona, Spain

Received 6 May 2009; returned 9 July 2009; revised 10 August 2009; accepted 11 August 2009


* Corresponding author. Tel: +34-93-260-7625; Fax: +34-93-260-7637; E-mail: 32186omr{at}comb.es

Objectives: The presence of bacterial biofilm, tolerance to antibiotics and dysfunctional activity of phagocytic cells are all related to difficulties in eradicating foreign-body infections. We aimed to quantify the presence of intracellular Staphylococcus aureus and to study the extent to which the intracellular activity of antibiotics might determine their efficacy against an experimental rat tissue-cage model of foreign-body infection.

Methods: Using this model, animals were treated for 7 days with 100 mg/kg/day levofloxacin or 200 mg/kg/12 h cloxacillin, or were left untreated. Antibiotic efficacy was evaluated by means of bacterial counts from tissue-cage fluid (TCF); these counts were derived separately in total, intracellular and extracellular bacteria. The presence of intracellular bacteria was checked by electron microscopy. Population analysis was performed with surviving bacteria recovered at the end of levofloxacin therapy.

Results: Among a total number of bacteria (mean log cfu/mL ± SD) from TCF of 6.86 ± 0.6, we identified 6.38 ± 0.8 intracellular bacteria and 5.57 ± 0.5 extracellular bacteria. Levofloxacin was more efficient than cloxacillin (P < 0.05) against both intracellular and extracellular bacteria. The killing activity of levofloxacin against the intracellular population was higher than against the extracellular bacteria (P = 0.1). The frequency of levofloxacin-resistant mutants among surviving bacteria at the end of levofloxacin therapy was similar to that for the wild-type strain.

Conclusions: Intracellular bacteria accounted for the largest proportion of the total inoculum in this model of foreign-body infection. The intracellular activity of an antibiotic seems to be an additional relevant factor in the antibiotic response to these infections.

Keywords: staphylococci , intracellular bacteria , animal model , intracellular infection , device-related infections


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.