Skip Navigation


JAC Advance Access originally published online on August 19, 2009
Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy 2009 64(4):837-839; doi:10.1093/jac/dkp301
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
64/4/837    most recent
dkp301v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Crandon, J. L.
Right arrow Articles by Nicolau, D. P.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Crandon, J. L.
Right arrow Articles by Nicolau, D. P.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2009. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the British Society for Antimicrobial Chemotherapy. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Original research

Comparison of tigecycline penetration into the epithelial lining fluid of infected and uninfected murine lungs

Jared L. Crandon1, Aryun Kim1 and David P. Nicolau1,2,*

1 Center for Anti-Infective Research and Development, Hartford Hospital, Hartford, CT, USA 2 Division of Infectious Diseases, Hartford Hospital, Hartford, CT, USA

Received 9 June 2009; returned 22 July 2009; revised 24 July 2009; accepted 27 July 2009


* Corresponding author. Center for Anti-Infective Research and Development, Hartford Hospital, 80 Seymour Street, Hartford, CT 06102, USA. Tel: +1-860-545-3941; Fax: +1-860-545-3992; E-mail: dnicola{at}harthosp.org

Objectives: When evaluating the pharmacodynamics of antimicrobials, assumptions are often made relative to their pharmacokinetics. One example of this is applying tissue penetration results of uninfected hosts to those displaying a targeted illness. As tigecycline evolves into a potential treatment option for pneumonia, we determined whether the presence of a lung infection affected the penetration of the drug into the epithelial lining fluid (ELF).

Methods: Single doses of tigecycline 50 and 25 mg/kg were administered to neutropenic ICR mice with or without the presence of an Acinetobacter baumannii lung infection. Serum samples were gathered at 0.5–24 h after tigecycline administration; bronchoalveolar lavage was conducted at 1, 1.5, 4 and 8 h. Tigecycline concentrations were determined by HPLC. Comparisons of ELF penetration in infected and uninfected lungs were based on the ratios of the AUC0–8 in ELF and the free AUC0–8 in serum. AUCs were calculated by the trapezoidal rule.

Results: The group without pulmonary infection displayed an ELF penetration ratio of 8.1 and 6.2 for the 50 and 25 mg/kg doses, respectively. The respective penetration ratios in the infected lungs were 23.3 and 12.9.

Conclusions: While tigecycline exhibits excellent ELF penetration in healthy and infected murine lungs, the presence of infection greatly enhances penetration. Moreover, increased systemic exposures of tigecycline result in greater ELF penetration, regardless of infection status. When future tigecycline clinical trials for the treatment of pneumonia are considered, escalated doses may reap greater than expected benefits towards achieving adequate pharmacodynamic indexes within the lungs.

Keywords: bronchopulmonary , pneumonia , pharmacokinetics


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.Home page
P. Koomanachai, J. L. Crandon, M. A. Banevicius, L. Peng, and D. P. Nicolau
Pharmacodynamic Profile of Tigecycline against Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus in an Experimental Pneumonia Model
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother., December 1, 2009; 53(12): 5060 - 5063.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.