Skip Navigation


JAC Advance Access originally published online on February 26, 2009
Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy 2009 63(5):1017-1024; doi:10.1093/jac/dkp034
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
63/5/1017    most recent
dkp034v2
dkp034v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kuo, C.-H.
Right arrow Articles by Wu, D.-C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kuo, C.-H.
Right arrow Articles by Wu, D.-C.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2009. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the British Society for Antimicrobial Chemotherapy. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Original research

Efficacy of levofloxacin-based rescue therapy for Helicobacter pylori infection after standard triple therapy: a randomized controlled trial

Chao-Hung Kuo1,2,3,4, Huang-Ming Hu1, Fu-Chen Kuo5, Ping-I. Hsu6, Angela Chen7,8, Fang-Jung Yu2, Pei-Yun Tsai9, I.-Chen Wu2, Sheng-Wen Wang2, Chia-Jung Li2, Bi-Chuang Weng2, Lin-Li Chang10, Chang-Ming Jan2,4, Wen-Ming Wang2,4 and Deng-Chyang Wu2,4,7,8,*

1 Division of Internal Medicine, Kaohsiung Municipal Hsiao-Kang Hospital, Kaohsiung, Taiwan 2 Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital, Kaohsiung, Taiwan 3 Graduate Institute of Medicine, College of Medicine, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan 4 Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, College of Medicine, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan 5 Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, E-Da Hospital, I-Shou University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan 6 Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Kaohsiung Veterans General Hospital and National Yang-Ming University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan 7 Institute of Biomedical Sciences, National Sun Yat-Sen University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan 8 National Sun Yat-Sen University—Kaoshiung Medical University Joint Center, Kaohsiung, Taiwan 9 Department of Nursing, Kaohsiung Municipal Hsiao-Kang Hospital, Kaohsiung, Taiwan 10 Department of Microbiology, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan

Received 2 September 2008; returned 12 October 2008; revised 9 January 2009; accepted 24 January 2009


* Correspondence address. Gastroenterology, Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital, No. 100, Tz-You 1st Road, Kaohsiung City 807, Taiwan. Tel: +886-7-3121101, ext. 7451; Fax: +886-7-3135612; E-mail: dechwu{at}yahoo.com

Objectives: This prospective study was designed to determine the efficacy of a levofloxacin-based rescue therapy for Helicobacter pylori infection after failure of standard triple therapies. We also surveyed the predictors of this rescue therapy.

Patients and methods: From June 2005 to March 2007, 1036 patients infected with H. pylori received standard triple regimens (proton pump inhibitor, clarithromycin and amoxicillin). H. pylori eradication was achieved in 855 (82.5%) subjects. One hundred and sixty-six eradication-failure patients were enrolled and randomly assigned to receive a 7 day eradication therapy with esomeprazole, bismuth subcitrate, tetracycline and metronidazole (EBTM) or esomeprazole, amoxicillin and levofloxacin (EAL). Follow-up endoscopy was done 16 weeks later to assess the treatment response. Patients' response, CYP2C19 genotypes and antibiotic resistances were also examined.

Results: Intention-to-treat analysis revealed that both groups showed similar eradication rates [EBTM 63.9%; 95% confidence interval (CI): 53.6–74.2 and EAL 69.9%; 95% CI: 60.1–79.7] (P = 0.89). Per-protocol results were EBTM = 84.1% (95% CI: 75.1–93.1) and EAL = 75.3% (95% CI: 65.8–84.8) (P = 0.82). Both regimens had similar compliance (P = 0.32), but the EBTM group had more adverse events (P = 0.27). Logistic regression analysis showed that poor compliance, CYP2C19 homozygous extensive metabolizer genotype and levofloxacin resistance were important predictors for eradication failure.

Conclusions: The EAL regimen can achieve an efficacy similar to that of the standard EBTM therapy. It may be very useful in countries where bismuth salts are not available. Compliance, CYP2C19 genotype and resistances to antibiotics may influence the outcome of levofloxacin-based rescue therapy. It seems advisable to reserve levofloxacin for rescue treatment to avoid an increase in the resistance phenomenon.

Keywords: fluoroquinolones , H. pylori , CYP2C19


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.Home page
M. O. Makobongo, T. Kovachi, H. Gancz, A. Mor, and D. S. Merrell
In Vitro Antibacterial Activity of Acyl-Lysyl Oligomers against Helicobacter pylori
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother., October 1, 2009; 53(10): 4231 - 4239.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.