JAC Advance Access originally published online on September 18, 2008
Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy 2008 62(6):1305-1310; doi:10.1093/jac/dkn379
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Original research |
Synergy between gemifloxacin and trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole against community-associated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus
1 Anti-Infective Research Laboratory, Eugene Applebaum College of Pharmacy and Health Sciences, Wayne State University, 259 Mack Avenue, Detroit, MI 48201, USA 2 Detroit Receiving Hospital, 4201 Saint Antoine Street, Detroit, MI 48201, USA 3 School of Medicine, Wayne State University, Detroit, MI 48201, USA 4 John D. Dingell VA Medical Center, 4646 John R Street, Detroit, MI 48201, USA
Received 10 June 2008; returned 18 July 2008; revised 23 July 2008; accepted 13 August 2008
* Correspondence address. Anti-Infective Research Laboratory, Pharmacy Practice—4148, Eugene Applebaum College of Pharmacy and Health Sciences, Wayne State University, 259 Mack Avenue, Detroit, MI 48201, USA. Tel: +1-313-577-4376; Fax: +1-313-577-8915; E-mail: m.rybak{at}wayne.edu
Objectives: The rapid emergence of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus from the community (CA-MRSA) presents difficulties in making treatment choices. We evaluated whether combining another orally available agent commonly used to treat CA-MRSA with gemifloxacin would enhance gemifloxacin activity against CA-MRSA.
Methods: Fifty strains of SCCmec IV, agr group 1, Panton–Valentine leucocidin-positive CA-MRSA were evaluated for susceptibilities to gemifloxacin, trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole, doxycycline, levofloxacin, rifampicin, clindamycin and erythromycin. Twenty of these strains were evaluated for the potential for synergy between gemifloxacin and trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole, clindamycin and rifampicin by time–kill analysis. Two strains were further evaluated in an in vitro pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) model.
Results: In time–kill analyses, gemifloxacin combined with trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole produced additivity (6/20) or synergy (11/20) in 85% of the isolates tested. The addition of clindamycin to gemifloxacin showed additivity (3/20) or synergy (2/20) in 25% of the isolates. All isolates displayed indifference to the combination of gemifloxacin and rifampicin. In the PK/PD model, combining gemifloxacin and trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole provided potent and sustained bactericidal activity to detection limits of 2 log10 cfu/mL by 48 h; gemifloxacin combined with clindamycin or with rifampicin killed to detection limits by 56 h or later. One isolate developed efflux-mediated resistance to gemifloxacin at 96 h with gemifloxacin monotherapy. All combinations prevented the emergence of this resistance.
Conclusions: Synergy or additivity was demonstrated by time–kill analysis between gemifloxacin and trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole in most isolates tested. In the PK/PD model, the addition of trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole, clindamycin and rifampicin enhanced the activity of gemifloxacin against CA-MRSA and suppressed the emergence of resistance to gemifloxacin.
Keywords: clindamycin , rifampicin , MRSA