Skip Navigation


JAC Advance Access originally published online on July 17, 2008
Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy 2008 62(5):1065-1069; doi:10.1093/jac/dkn288
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
62/5/1065    most recent
dkn288v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lubenko, I. Yu.
Right arrow Articles by Firsov, A. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Lubenko, I. Yu.
Right arrow Articles by Firsov, A. A.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2008. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the British Society for Antimicrobial Chemotherapy. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Original research

Telavancin and vancomycin pharmacodynamics with Staphylococcus aureus in an in vitro dynamic model

Irene Yu. Lubenko1,2, Elena V. Strukova1, Maria V. Smirnova1, Sergey N. Vostrov1,2, Yury A. Portnoy1,2, Stephen H. Zinner3 and Alexander A. Firsov1,*

1 Department of Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics, Gause Institute of New Antibiotics, Russian Academy of Medical Sciences, 11 Bolshaya Pirogovskaya Street, Moscow 119021, Russia 2 Anokhin Institute of Normal Physiology, Russian Academy of Medical Sciences, Moscow, Russia 3 Mount Auburn Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Cambridge, MA, USA

Received 28 February 2008; returned 30 April 2008; revised 11 June 2008; accepted 18 June 2008


* Corresponding author. Tel: +7-495-708-3341; Fax: +7-495-245-0295; E-mail: firsov{at}dol.ru

Objectives: The aim of this study was to compare the pharmacodynamics of telavancin (TLV) and vancomycin (VAN) with Staphylococcus aureus. Their concentrations were simulated between the MIC and the mutant prevention concentration (MPC), and above the MPC.

Methods: Two strains of S. aureus, glycopeptide-intermediate S. aureus (GISA) Mu-50 and ATCC 43300, were exposed for 5 days to once-daily TLV (half-life 8 h) and twice-daily VAN (half-life 6 h). The simulated ratios of 24 h area under the curve (AUC24) to MIC varied from 30–50 to 3400 h. The cumulative antimicrobial effect was expressed by ABBC (area between the level corresponding to the starting inoculum and the time–kill curve calculated from time 0 to 144 h).

Results: With each antibiotic, the ABBC versus log AUC24/MIC relationships were bacterial strain-independent. A sigmoid model fits combined data on both organisms exposed to TLV (r2=0.78) or VAN (r2=0.85). Comparable effects of the proposed therapeutic dose of TLV (10 mg/kg) and a clinical dose of VAN (2x1 g) were predicted for MRSA ATCC 43300 (AUC24/MIC 3400 and 500 h, respectively) and a 1.6-fold greater effect of TLV for GISA Mu-50 compared with VAN (AUC24/MIC 1700 and 130 h, respectively). Mutants of S. aureus ATCC 43300 resistant to 2x and 4x MIC of VAN but not TLV were enriched in these simulations. No selection of TLV- and VAN-resistant mutants of GISA Mu-50 was observed.

Conclusions: These in vitro data suggest that the effects of clinically attainable AUC/MIC ratios of TLV are similar to those of VAN on S. aureus 43300 and 2-fold greater on GISA Mu-50.

Keywords: telavancin , vancomycin , S. aureus , pharmacodynamics , in vitro model


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.