Skip Navigation


JAC Advance Access originally published online on September 7, 2007
Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy 2007 60(5):1131-1136; doi:10.1093/jac/dkm313
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
60/5/1131    most recent
dkm313v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Opmeer, B. C.
Right arrow Articles by de Borgie, C. A. J. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Opmeer, B. C.
Right arrow Articles by de Borgie, C. A. J. M.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2007. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the British Society for Antimicrobial Chemotherapy. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Costs associated with shorter duration of antibiotic therapy in hospitalized patients with mild-to-moderate–severe community-acquired pneumonia

B. C. Opmeer1,*, R. el Moussaoui2, P. M. M. Bossuyt1, P. Speelman2, J. M. Prins2 and C. A. J. M. de Borgie1

1 Academic Medical Centre, Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, PO Box 22660, 1100 DD Amsterdam, The Netherlands 2 Academic Medical Centre, Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Infectious Diseases, Tropical Medicine and AIDS, PO Box 22660, 1100 DD, Amsterdam, The Netherlands

Received 21 May 2007; returned 30 July 2007; accepted 31 July 2007


* Corresponding author. Tel: +31-20-566-7002; Fax: +31-20-691-2683; E-mail: b.c.opmeer{at}amc.uva.nl

Objectives: The optimal duration of antibiotic therapy in patients with uncomplicated pneumonia may be shorter than that recommended in the current guidelines. A shorter duration will probably also lead to a cost reduction. This study evaluates the costs associated with 3 versus 8 day antibiotic therapy and subsequent follow-up in patients hospitalized with mild-to-moderate–severe community-acquired pneumonia.

Patients and methods: The economic evaluation was based on primary resource utilization data collected within the framework of a randomized, double blind, placebo-controlled trial. As 3 day therapy was shown to be clinically not inferior to 8 day therapy, the cost-minimization analysis was performed based on direct medical and indirect non-medical costs, estimated from a societal perspective for the 28 days following hospital admission.

Results: Lower costs of shorter therapy during hospital admission ({euro}209 lower) were partially offset by higher costs for primary healthcare providers ({euro}66 higher). The average costs generated per patient by resource utilization during admission and follow-up were estimated as {euro}3959 in the 3 day group versus {euro}4102 in the 8 day group (difference {euro}143 in favour of shorter therapy). The difference was affected by changes in assumptions concerning the unit costs for hospital stay but was consistently in favour of shorter therapy.

Conclusions: Shorter duration of antibiotic therapy in hospitalized patients with uncomplicated pneumonia does not result in a substantial substitution of resource utilization to primary healthcare providers. As 3 day antibiotic therapy does not lead to inferior clinical results, these findings support a 3 day therapy as a more efficient strategy.

Keywords: randomized controlled trials , economic evaluation , cost-effectiveness


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.