Skip Navigation


JAC Advance Access originally published online on August 2, 2007
Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy 2007 60(4):733-740; doi:10.1093/jac/dkm273
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
60/4/733    most recent
dkm273v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (5)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Wierzbowski, A. K.
Right arrow Articles by Zhanel, G. G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Wierzbowski, A. K.
Right arrow Articles by Zhanel, G. G.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2007. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the British Society for Antimicrobial Chemotherapy. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Macrolide resistance mechanisms among Streptococcus pneumoniae isolated over 6 years of Canadian Respiratory Organism Susceptibility Study (CROSS) (1998–2004)

A. K. Wierzbowski1,*, K. Nichol1,2, N. Laing1, T. Hisanaga1, A. Nikulin3, J. A. Karlowsky1,2, D. J. Hoban1,2 and G. G. Zhanel1,2

1 Department of Medical Microbiology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada 2 Department of Clinical Microbiology, Health Sciences Centre, MS673-820 Sherbrook Street, Winnipeg, Manitoba, R3A 1R9, Canada 3 Institute of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy, Smolonsk, Russian Federation

Received 1 February 2007; returned 11 March 2007; revised 14 June 2007; accepted 1 July 2007


* Corresponding author. Tel: +1-204-787-4684; Fax: +1-204-787-4699; E-mail: aw75{at}shaw.ca

Background: Resistance to macrolides in Streptococcus pneumoniae arises primarily due to Erm(B) or Mef(A). Erm(B) typically confers high-level resistance to macrolides, lincosamides and streptogramin B (MLSB phenotype), whereas Mef(A) confers low-level resistance to macrolides only (M phenotype). The purpose of this study was to investigate the incidence of macrolide resistance mechanisms in Canadian isolates of S. pneumoniae obtained between 1998 and 2004. Furthermore, the genetic relatedness, serotype distribution and antibiotic susceptibility profile among S. pneumoniae isolates with dual erythromycin ribosomal methylase [Erm(B)] and efflux pump [Mef(A)] were analysed.

Methods: A total of 865 macrolide-resistant (erythromycin MIC ≥ 1 mg/L) S. pneumoniae isolates were collected from the Canadian Respiratory Organism Susceptibility Study (CROSS) from 1998 to 2004. The presence of erm(B) and mef(A) was determined for each isolate by PCR; mutations in the genes coding for L4 and L22 ribosomal proteins and for 23S rRNA were identified by DNA sequencing. Each isolate containing both erm(B)- and mef(A)-mediated macrolide resistance was genotyped by PFGE and serotyped using the Quellung reaction with antisera.

Results: Of the 865 isolates studied, 404 (46.7%) were mef(A)-positive, 371 (42.9%) were erm(B)-positive, 50 (5.8%) were positive for both mef(A) and erm(B) and 40 (4.6%) were negative for both mef(A) and erm(B). Of the macrolide-resistant isolates negative for both mef(A) and erm(B), 22 (2.5%) contained 23S rRNA A2058G, A2059G or A2059C mutations, 7 (0.8%) contained 23S rRNA A2058G or A2059G mutations along with an S20N mutation in L4 ribosomal protein, and 1 isolate contained an E30K ribosomal protein mutation alone. Of the macrolide-resistant strains positive for both mef(A) and erm(B), 36 (72%) were multidrug-resistant (macrolide-, penicillin- and trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole-resistant), 39 (78%) isolates belonged to serotype 19A or 19F and 36 (72%) belonged to one clonal complex (≥80% genetic relatedness) genetically related to the Taiwan 19F-14 clone.

Conclusions: The prevalence of efflux-based macrolide resistance in S. pneumoniae in Canada remained steady between 1998 and 2004. Macrolide resistance due to erm(B) decreased over the same time period, with a rapid increase in isolates with both erm(B) and mef(A) macrolide resistance.

Keywords: pneumococci , Canada , S. pneumoniae


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.Home page
L.-J. Jiang and Y. S. Or
Pharmacokinetics of EDP-420 after Multiple Oral Doses in Healthy Adult Volunteers and in a Bioequivalence Study
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother., August 1, 2009; 53(8): 3218 - 3225.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.Home page
L.-J. Jiang, M. Wang, and Y. S. Or
Pharmacokinetics of EDP-420 after Ascending Single Oral Doses in Healthy Adult Volunteers
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother., May 1, 2009; 53(5): 1786 - 1792.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.Home page
L. Siira, M. Rantala, J. Jalava, A. J. Hakanen, P. Huovinen, T. Kaijalainen, O. Lyytikainen, and A. Virolainen
Temporal Trends of Antimicrobial Resistance and Clonality of Invasive Streptococcus pneumoniae Isolates in Finland, 2002 to 2006
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother., May 1, 2009; 53(5): 2066 - 2073.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Antimicrob ChemotherHome page
A. K. Wierzbowski, J. A. Karlowsky, D. J. Hoban, and G. G. Zhanel
In vitro activity of the investigational ketolide cethromycin against macrolide- and penicillin-resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae: review of the 1998 to 2006 Canadian Respiratory Organism Susceptibility Study (CROSS)
J. Antimicrob. Chemother., March 1, 2009; 63(3): 620 - 622.
[Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.