Skip Navigation


JAC Advance Access originally published online on June 26, 2007
Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy 2007 60(3):605-612; doi:10.1093/jac/dkm228
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
60/3/605    most recent
dkm228v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Canut, A.
Right arrow Articles by Maortua, H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Canut, A.
Right arrow Articles by Maortua, H.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2007. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the British Society for Antimicrobial Chemotherapy. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

What are the most appropriate antibiotics for the treatment of acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease? A therapeutic outcomes model

Andrés Canut1,*, Jose E. Martín-Herrero2, Alicia Labora1 and Hiart Maortua1

1 Department of Clinical Microbiology, Hospital Santiago Apóstol, Vitoria, Spain 2 Medical Department, GlaxoSmithKline S.A., Tres Cantos, Spain

Received 10 January 2007; returned 25 March 2007; revised 24 May 2007; accepted 26 May 2007


* Corresponding author. Tel: +34-945007874; E-mail: acanut{at}hsan.osakidetza.net

Objectives: To predict the clinical efficacy of several antimicrobials in the treatment of patients with acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (AECOPD).

Methods: A probability model (therapeutic outcomes model) was used to predict the likelihood of clinical success with particular antimicrobial agents in the treatment of patients with AECOPD, both in those clinically diagnosed (total patients with an AECOPD diagnosis regardless of the cause) and in those with bacterial AECOPD. The model took into account the following variables: (i) the proportion of patients with a clinical diagnosis of AECOPD and non-bacterial disease; (ii) likelihood of spontaneous resolution of a non-bacterial infection; (iii) prevalence of subcauses (different bacterial species) in bacterial AECOPD; (iv) rates of spontaneous resolution of bacterial AECOPD; and (v) antimicrobial efficacy of each antibiotic against each bacterial species (susceptibility based on PK/PD breakpoints).

Results: Fluoroquinolones (levofloxacin, ciprofloxacin and moxifloxacin), a new third-generation oral cephalosporin (cefditoren) and high doses of amoxicillin/clavulanate were the antimicrobials with the highest predicted clinical efficacy both in mild–moderate AECOPD and in severe AECOPD (rates of 89.2% to 90.5% and 80.3% to 88.1%, respectively), whereas cefaclor, azithromycin, erythromycin and clarithromycin had the lowest predicted clinical efficacy (rates of 79.1% to 81.3% and 51.8% to 55.6% for mild–moderate and severe AECOPD, respectively), which was not much higher than that predicted for placebo (73.6% and 45.5%, respectively).

Conclusions: According to our model, fluoroquinolones (levofloxacin, ciprofloxacin and moxifloxacin), cefditoren and amoxicillin/clavulanate are the most appropriate antibiotics for the treatment of patients with AECOPD in terms of predicted clinical efficacy, with wide differences with respect to other antibiotics commonly used in the treatment of these patients, such as clarithromycin and azithromycin.

Keywords: mathematical models , AECOPD , resistance


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.