Skip Navigation


JAC Advance Access originally published online on May 31, 2007
Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy 2007 60(2):334-340; doi:10.1093/jac/dkm170
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
60/2/334    most recent
dkm170v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Rose, W. E.
Right arrow Articles by Kaatz, G. W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Rose, W. E.
Right arrow Articles by Kaatz, G. W.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2007. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the British Society for Antimicrobial Chemotherapy. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Evaluation of daptomycin treatment of Staphylococcus aureus bacterial endocarditis: an in vitro and in vivo simulation using historical and current dosing strategies

Warren E. Rose1,2, Michael J. Rybak1,2,3,* and Glenn W. Kaatz1,3,4

1 Anti-Infective Research Laboratory, Department of Pharmacy Practice, Eugene Applebaum College of Pharmacy and Health Sciences, Wayne State University, Detroit, MI, USA 2 Detroit Receiving Hospital, Detroit, MI 48201, USA 3 School of Medicine, Wayne State University, Detroit, MI 48201, USA 4 John D. Dingell Department of Veteran's Affairs Medical Center, Detroit, MI 48201, USA

Received 22 March 2007; returned 17 April 2007; revised 20 April 2007; accepted 21 April 2007


* Corresponding author. Tel: +1-313-577-4376; Fax: +1-313-577-8915; E-mail: m.rybak{at}wayne.edu

Objectives: A failure to daptomycin therapy and subsequent emergence of a daptomycin non-susceptible isolate occurred during the 1990 clinical investigation of daptomycin for the treatment of Staphylococcus aureus bacteraemia and endocarditis. We attempted to determine if this occurrence was reproducible in vitro and if it could be prevented by various daptomycin dosing strategies.

Methods: The daptomycin susceptible parent strain (SA-675) and the subsequent non-susceptible derivative (SA-684) were evaluated. In the rabbit endocarditis model, daptomycin 3 mg/kg every 8 h for 4 days was administered to simulate the study patient's pharmacokinetic exposure. Daptomycin doses of 1.5 and 3 mg/kg every 12 h and 6 and 10 mg/kg every 24 and 48 h were simulated in the in vitro model with simulated endocardial vegetations (SEVs).

Results: Daptomycin significantly reduced bacterial counts of SA-675 in rabbits, but one in 105–106 organisms from vegetations of one animal had an 8-fold increase in MIC. Daptomycin 1.5 mg/kg every 12 h in the in vitro model demonstrated no activity against either strain; reduced susceptibility emerged in SA-675 (4-fold increase in MIC). Bactericidal activity was noted with 6 and 10 mg/kg dosing against SA-675 with no resistance detected. The activity of the 6 mg/kg regimen was reduced against SA-684 but significantly improved activity was noted with 10 mg/kg daily.

Conclusions: The emergence of resistance was successfully recreated at suboptimal dosing regimens while the current recommended regimen of 6 mg/kg/day prevented the emergence of non-susceptible mutants. Daptomycin 10 mg/kg/day demonstrated even more enhanced killing. Further investigation with daptomycin 10 mg/kg is warranted.

Keywords: pharmacodynamics , pharmacokinetics , daptomycin non-susceptibility


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Antimicrob ChemotherHome page
D. P. Levine
Clinical experience with daptomycin: bacteraemia and endocarditis
J. Antimicrob. Chemother., November 1, 2008; 62(suppl_3): iii35 - iii39.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Antimicrob ChemotherHome page
R. E. Warren
Daptomycin in endocarditis and bacteraemia: a British perspective
J. Antimicrob. Chemother., November 1, 2008; 62(suppl_3): iii25 - iii33.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Antimicrob ChemotherHome page
D. M. Livermore
Future directions with daptomycin
J. Antimicrob. Chemother., November 1, 2008; 62(suppl_3): iii41 - iii49.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.Home page
W. E. Rose, S. N. Leonard, and M. J. Rybak
Evaluation of Daptomycin Pharmacodynamics and Resistance at Various Dosage Regimens against Staphylococcus aureus Isolates with Reduced Susceptibilities to Daptomycin in an In Vitro Pharmacodynamic Model with Simulated Endocardial Vegetations
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother., September 1, 2008; 52(9): 3061 - 3067.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.Home page
W. E. Rose, S. N. Leonard, G. Sakoulas, G. W. Kaatz, M. J. Zervos, A. Sheth, C. F. Carpenter, and M. J. Rybak
Daptomycin Activity against Staphylococcus aureus following Vancomycin Exposure in an In Vitro Pharmacodynamic Model with Simulated Endocardial Vegetations
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother., March 1, 2008; 52(3): 831 - 836.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.