Skip Navigation


JAC Advance Access originally published online on February 9, 2007
Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy 2007 59(4):767-771; doi:10.1093/jac/dkl555
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
59/4/767    most recent
dkl555v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (2)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Fleck, R.
Right arrow Articles by Hof, H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Fleck, R.
Right arrow Articles by Hof, H.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2007. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the British Society for Antimicrobial Chemotherapy. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

In vitro susceptibility of Candida species to five antifungal agents in a German university hospital assessed by the reference broth microdilution method and Etest

Ralf Fleck*, Annebärbel Dietz and Herbert Hof

Institute of Medical Microbiology and Hygiene, Faculty of Clinical Medicine Mannheim, University of Heidelberg, Germany

Received 1 September 2006; returned 14 October 2006; revised 23 November 2006; accepted 21 December 2006


* Corresponding author. Tel: +49-621-383-2695; Fax: +49-621-383-3816; E-mail: ralf.fleck{at}imh.ma.uni-heidelberg.de

Objectives: The aim of this study is to evaluate the susceptibilities of Candida spp. to the common antifungal agents in a German university hospital. Since quick results of in vitro testing are desirable, Etest and the CLSI broth microdilution (BMD) method (reference method) were compared, focusing on the validity of early readings.

Methods: A total of 512 Candida spp. isolates, including 174 from primarily sterile sites, were collected in the clinical routine. The yeasts were differentiated by CHROMagar and verified by API 20C AUX if necessary. In vitro susceptibilities to amphotericin B, flucytosine, fluconazole, voriconazole and caspofungin were determined using the BMD method described in the CLSI (formerly NCCLS) M27-A2 document and Etest. MICs were noted after 24 and 48 h of incubation.

Results: The most frequently isolated species was Candida albicans. Among the non-albicans species, Candida glabrata was the most prevalent, followed by Candida tropicalis, Candida parapsilosis and Candida krusei. MICs (mg/L) at which 90% of the strains were inhibited were 1 for amphotericin B, 32 for flucytosine, 8 for fluconazole, 0.25 for voriconazole and 1 for caspofungin. Susceptibility to fluconazole was 85.0% for C. glabrata and 5.3% for C. krusei, almost all other isolates were susceptible in over 90% except very rare species. The 48 h MIC values of Etest and BMD were in agreement (no more than 2 log2 dilutions) in 88.7% to 98.1% with categorical agreement rates of 91.6% to 98.2%, depending on the antifungal agent. Comparison of the 24 h MICs of both BMD and Etest with the 48 h MICs of the reference method showed categorical agreement in 94.9% to 99.2%. For caspofungin, however, a comparison of the categorical agreement was not possible due to the lack of interpretive breakpoints. The order of frequency and the resistance patterns of the isolates from primarily sterile sites and those of isolates from non-sterile sites did not differ.

Conclusions: No alarming resistances against the agents tested were found; however, owing to the relatively high frequency of C. glabrata with elevated fluconazole MICs, this species and, to a certain extent, C. krusei must be taken into consideration when choosing antifungal agents for calculated therapy. Etest is a reliable method for the susceptibility testing of Candida spp. and the 24 h readings of both Etest and BMD can serve as helpful preliminary results in most cases.

Keywords: caspofungin , voriconazole , fluconazole , flucytosine , amphotericin B


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Clin. Microbiol.Home page
M. Desnos-Ollivier, F. Dromer, and E. Dannaoui
Detection of Caspofungin Resistance in Candida spp. by Etest
J. Clin. Microbiol., July 1, 2008; 46(7): 2389 - 2392.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.Home page
E. Dannaoui, O. Lortholary, D. Raoux, M. E. Bougnoux, G. Galeazzi, C. Lawrence, D. Moissenet, I. Poilane, D. Hoinard, F. Dromer, et al.
Comparative In Vitro Activities of Caspofungin and Micafungin, Determined Using the Method of the European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing, against Yeast Isolates Obtained in France in 2005-2006
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother., February 1, 2008; 52(2): 778 - 781.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Antimicrob ChemotherHome page
D. Armstrong-James
Invasive Candida species infection: the importance of adequate empirical antifungal therapy
J. Antimicrob. Chemother., September 1, 2007; 60(3): 459 - 460.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.