Skip Navigation


JAC Advance Access originally published online on October 24, 2006
Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy 2006 58(6):1303-1306; doi:10.1093/jac/dkl432
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
58/6/1303    most recent
dkl432v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (3)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hillier, S.
Right arrow Articles by Butler, C. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hillier, S.
Right arrow Articles by Butler, C. C.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2006. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the British Society for Antimicrobial Chemotherapy. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

When do general practitioners request urine specimens for microbiology analysis? The applicability of antibiotic resistance surveillance based on routinely collected data

Sharon Hillier1,*, Joanna Bell2, Margaret Heginbothom2, Zoë Roberts1, Frank Dunstan1, Anthony Howard3, Brendan Mason2 and Christopher C. Butler4

1 Department of Epidemiology, Statistics and Public Health Centre for Health Sciences Research, Cardiff University, Neuadd Meirionnydd, Heath Park, Cardiff CF14 4XN, UK 2 National Public Health Service for Wales, CDSC Wales Abton House, Wedal Road, Cardiff CF14 3QX, UK 3 ICDS Corporate Office, Temple of Peace & Health, Cathays Park Cardiff CF10 3NW, UK 4 Department of General Practice, Centre for Health Sciences Research, Cardiff University Neuadd Meirionnydd, Heath Park, Cardiff CF14 4XN, UK

Received 12 June 2006; returned 2 August 2006; revised 25 September 2006; accepted 28 September 2006


*Corresponding author: Tel: +44-29-20-687228; Fax: +44-29-20-687236; E-mail: sharon.hillier{at}nphs.wales.nhs.uk

Objectives: We do not know how representative reported levels of resistance to antibiotics in urinary tract infections (UTIs) are as there is wide variation in the rate of urine specimens submitted to microbiology laboratories by general practices. We used a questionnaire to investigate variation in sampling for patients with suspected UTI to explore any systematic bias that may influence interpretation of surveillance data based on routine data.

Methods: We sent a questionnaire to a stratified random sample of general practitioners (GPs) in Wales for self-completion. The GPs were presented with six clinical scenarios and asked about their proposed clinical management.

Results: We found that nearly all of the GPs indicated they would request a specimen for scenarios representing a probable UTI in a female child and a probable asymptomatic UTI in pregnancy. There was some variation between the GPs about sampling in a situation of treatment failure in an older woman and recurrent UTI in a male diabetic, with 90% and 81%, respectively, indicating they would request a specimen for these scenarios. The greatest variation was in relation to scenarios concerning the management of a probable uncomplicated UTI, and early patient symptoms with pressure to prescribe, with 56% and 33% of GPs, respectively, indicating they would request a urine specimen for laboratory analysis.

Conclusions: In the light of this reported sampling behaviour, it is likely that there is a systematic bias in surveillance data based on routinely collected data, with samples from cases of uncomplicated UTI being under represented, potentially leading to an overestimation of true resistance rates.

Keywords: urinary tract infections , UTIs , community, survey , questionnaire


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Antimicrob ChemotherHome page
D. De Backer, T. Christiaens, S. Heytens, A. De Sutter, E. E. Stobberingh, and G. Verschraegen
Evolution of bacterial susceptibility pattern of Escherichia coli in uncomplicated urinary tract infections in a country with high antibiotic consumption: a comparison of two surveys with a 10 year interval
J. Antimicrob. Chemother., August 1, 2008; 62(2): 364 - 368.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.Home page
R. Colgan, J. R. Johnson, M. Kuskowski, and K. Gupta
Risk Factors for Trimethoprim-Sulfamethoxazole Resistance in Patients with Acute Uncomplicated Cystitis
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother., March 1, 2008; 52(3): 846 - 851.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BMJHome page
D. Mangin and L. Toop
Urinary tract infection in primary care
BMJ, March 24, 2007; 334(7594): 597 - 598.
[Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.