Skip Navigation


JAC Advance Access originally published online on June 16, 2006
Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy 2006 58(2):349-358; doi:10.1093/jac/dkl250
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
58/2/349    most recent
dkl250v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (8)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Alou, L.
Right arrow Articles by Prieto, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Alou, L.
Right arrow Articles by Prieto, J.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2006. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the British Society for Antimicrobial Chemotherapy. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

A pharmacodynamic approach to antimicrobial activity in serum and epithelial lining fluid against in vivo-selected Streptococcus pneumoniae mutants and association with clinical failure in pneumonia

Luis Alou1, María-José Giménez1, David Sevillano1, Lorenzo Aguilar1, Fabio Cafini1, Olatz Echeverría1, Emilio Pérez-Trallero2 and José Prieto1,*

1 Microbiology Department, School of Medicine, Universidad Complutense Avda. Complutense s/n, 28040 Madrid, Spain 2 Microbiology Department, Hospital Donostia, Paseo Dr Beguiristáin s/n 20014 Donostia, San Sebastián, Spain

Received 1 March 2006; returned 11 May 2006; revised 24 May 2006; accepted 24 May 2006


*Corresponding author. Tel: +34-91-3941508; Fax: +34-91-3941511; E-mail: jprieto{at}med.ucm.es

Objectives: Emergence of resistance may be prevented by killing both the parental infecting strain and subsequent less susceptible step-mutants. The present study analyses eradication and resistance selection in Streptococcus pneumoniae with moxifloxacin, levofloxacin and azithromycin, using a parental serotype 3 clinical strain (strain A) and its correspondent step-mutant derivatives resistant to these antibiotics (B, C, D), which were selected in vivo in a patient with pneumonia.

Methods: Moxifloxacin, levofloxacin and azithromycin MICs were 1, 2 and 0.5 mg/L for the parental strain; 4, 16 and 4 mg/L for isolate B; and 4, 16 and >128 mg/L for isolates C and D, respectively. A pharmacokinetic computerized device was used to simulate serum and epithelial lining fluid (ELF) concentrations. Initial inoculum was ~108 cfu/mL. Population analysis profiles were performed using plates with increasing antimicrobial concentrations.

Results: In ELF simulations, moxifloxacin showed a bactericidal pattern against all isolates with a minority (~100 cfu/mL) of the surviving population (isolates B, C and D) growing on plates with moxifloxacin concentrations just above those in ELF. Levofloxacin and azithromycin showed a bactericidal pattern only against isolate A, with the whole population of isolates B, C and D growing on plates with levofloxacin concentrations higher (16–64 mg/L) than those in ELF and in plates with azithromycin concentrations as high as 2048 mg/L (for isolates C and D).

Conclusions: Antimicrobial activity in pulmonary tissue against possible emerging resistant mutants during pneumonia treatment may prevent failures more than the solely activity against the S. pneumoniae parental infecting strain.

Keywords: moxifloxacin , levofloxacin , azithromycin , pharmacodynamics


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.