Skip Navigation


JAC Advance Access originally published online on April 19, 2006
Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy 2006 57(6):1116-1121; doi:10.1093/jac/dkl135
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
57/6/1116    most recent
dkl135v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (14)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Olofsson, S. K.
Right arrow Articles by Cars, O.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Olofsson, S. K.
Right arrow Articles by Cars, O.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2006. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the British Society for Antimicrobial Chemotherapy. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Selection of ciprofloxacin resistance in Escherichia coli in an in vitro kinetic model: relation between drug exposure and mutant prevention concentration

Sara K. Olofsson1, Linda L. Marcusson2, Patricia Komp Lindgren2, Diarmaid Hughes2 and Otto Cars1,*

1 Antibiotic Research Unit, Department of Medical Sciences, Clinical Bacteriology and Infectious Diseases, Uppsala University S-751 22 Uppsala, Sweden 2 Microbiology Programme, Department of Cell and Molecular Biology, Biomedical Center, Uppsala University S-751 24 Uppsala, Sweden

Received 19 July 2005; returned 16 October 2005; revised 9 February 2006; accepted 21 March 2006

*Corresponding author. Tel: +46-18-611-5640; Fax: +46-18-611-5650; E-mail: otto.cars{at}smi.ki.se

Objectives: To evaluate the mutant prevention concentrations (MPCs) of ciprofloxacin for two susceptible and one first-step gyrA resistant mutant Escherichia coli strains in an in vitro kinetic model and to identify the pharmacodynamic index that best predicts prevention of resistance emergence.

Methods: An in vitro kinetic model was used to measure MPC with static antibiotic concentrations and to test different dosing profiles to study pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics indices important to prevent the growth of resistant mutants. In one set of kinetic experiments the starting concentration was equal to the MPC and the T > MPC was varied before antibiotic dilution was begun. In a second set of kinetic experiments Cmax was varied and dilution of the antibiotic was started at time zero.

Results: From the static experiments we calculated MPC values of 0.128 mg/L for both the susceptible strains (16x MIC) and 0.188 mg/L (4x MIC) for the first-step resistant (gyrA) strain. The kinetic experiments showed that the T > MPC needed to prevent the growth of resistant bacteria was shorter with an increased Cmax. When resistance was selected, several subpopulations with different levels of susceptibility to ciprofloxacin emerged.

Conclusions: Neither T > MPC nor Cmax proved to be single correlates for preventing resistance development. For the two investigated wild-type strains, an AUC/MPC ratio of ≥22 was the single pharmacodynamic index that predicted prevention of resistant mutant development.

Keywords: antibiotic resistance , MPC , PK/PD , E. coli


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 J Antimicrob ChemotherHome page
X. Zhao and K. Drlica
A unified anti-mutant dosing strategy
J. Antimicrob. Chemother., September 1, 2008; 62(3): 434 - 436.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.Home page
A. A. Firsov, I. Y. Lubenko, M. V. Smirnova, E. N. Strukova, and S. H. Zinner
Enrichment of Fluoroquinolone-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus: Oscillating Ciprofloxacin Concentrations Simulated at the Upper and Lower Portions of the Mutant Selection Window
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother., June 1, 2008; 52(6): 1924 - 1928.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J Antimicrob ChemotherHome page
A. Cesaro, R. R. D. Bettoni, C. Lascols, A. Merens, C. J. Soussy, and E. Cambau
Low selection of topoisomerase mutants from strains of Escherichia coli harbouring plasmid-borne qnr genes
J. Antimicrob. Chemother., May 1, 2008; 61(5): 1007 - 1015.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.Home page
T. Homma, T. Hori, G. Sugimori, and Y. Yamano
Pharmacodynamic Assessment Based on Mutant Prevention Concentrations of Fluoroquinolones To Prevent the Emergence of Resistant Mutants of Streptococcus pneumoniae
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother., November 1, 2007; 51(11): 3810 - 3815.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.Home page
A. Ferran, V. Dupouy, P.-L. Toutain, and A. Bousquet-Melou
Influence of Inoculum Size on the Selection of Resistant Mutants of Escherichia coli in Relation to Mutant Prevention Concentrations of Marbofloxacin
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother., November 1, 2007; 51(11): 4163 - 4166.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J Antimicrob ChemotherHome page
S. K. Olofsson, L. L. Marcusson, A. Stromback, D. Hughes, and O. Cars
Dose-related selection of fluoroquinolone-resistant Escherichia coli
J. Antimicrob. Chemother., October 1, 2007; 60(4): 795 - 801.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J Antimicrob ChemotherHome page
W. H. F. Goessens, J. W. Mouton, M. T. ten Kate, A. J. Bijl, A. Ott, and I. A. J. M. Bakker-Woudenberg
Role of ceftazidime dose regimen on the selection of resistant Enterobacter cloacae in the intestinal flora of rats treated for an experimental pulmonary infection
J. Antimicrob. Chemother., March 1, 2007; 59(3): 507 - 516.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J Antimicrob ChemotherHome page
A. A. Firsov, M. V. Smirnova, I. Yu. Lubenko, S. N. Vostrov, Y. A. Portnoy, and S. H. Zinner
Testing the mutant selection window hypothesis with Staphylococcus aureus exposed to daptomycin and vancomycin in an in vitro dynamic model
J. Antimicrob. Chemother., December 1, 2006; 58(6): 1185 - 1192.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.