JAC Advance Access originally published online on January 12, 2006
Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy 2006 57(3):506-510; doi:10.1093/jac/dki486
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Decreased susceptibility to glycopeptides in methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus: a 20 year study in a large French teaching hospital, 19832002
Université Pierre et Marie Curie-Paris6; AP-HP, Hôpital Pitié-Salpêtrière, Laboratoire de Bactériologie-Hygiène, Paris, F75013, France
Received 19 September 2005; returned 11 November 2005; revised 9 December 2005; accepted 15 December 2005
* Corresponding author. Tel: +33-1-40-77-97-46; Fax: +33-1-45-82-75-77; E-mail: jrobert{at}chups.jussieu.fr
Objectives: To assess the evolution of glycopeptide susceptibility in methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) strains isolated in a large French teaching hospital from 1983 to 2002.
Methods: Determination of glycopeptide MICs by using the Etest method in MuellerHinton agar on a sample of randomly selected MRSA strains.
Results: A total of 1445 MRSA strains were tested, and one vancomycin-intermediate MRSA (VISA) and 31 teicoplanin-intermediate MRSA (TISA) strains were detected. The first strains were detected in 1985, and all strains were gentamicin resistant (GR). None of the gentamicin-susceptible strains had a glycopeptide MIC > 3 mg/L. In addition, there was a significant increase in glycopeptide MIC geometric means over the years, and this increase was higher for teicoplanin than for vancomycin.
Conclusions: The higher increase in teicoplanin MICs, and the good correlation between vancomycin and teicoplanin MICs, suggests systematic determination of teicoplanin MIC to screen for abnormal glycopeptide susceptibility among GR-MRSA.
Keywords: S. aureus , vancomycin , teicoplanin , GISA , gentamicin
![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
B. P. Howden, J. K. Davies, P. D. R. Johnson, T. P. Stinear, and M. L. Grayson Reduced Vancomycin Susceptibility in Staphylococcus aureus, Including Vancomycin-Intermediate and Heterogeneous Vancomycin-Intermediate Strains: Resistance Mechanisms, Laboratory Detection, and Clinical Implications Clin. Microbiol. Rev., January 1, 2010; 23(1): 99 - 139. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Fernandez, J. J. Hilliard, D. Abbanat, W. Zhang, J. L. Melton, C. M. Santoro, R. K. Flamm, and K. Bush In Vivo Activity of Ceftobiprole in Murine Skin Infections Due to Staphylococcus aureus and Pseudomonas aeruginosa Antimicrob. Agents Chemother., January 1, 2010; 54(1): 116 - 125. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Svetitsky, L. Leibovici, and M. Paul Comparative Efficacy and Safety of Vancomycin versus Teicoplanin: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Antimicrob. Agents Chemother., October 1, 2009; 53(10): 4069 - 4079. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. S. Sader, P. D. Fey, D. N. Fish, A. P. Limaye, G. Pankey, J. Rahal, M. J. Rybak, D. R. Snydman, L. L. Steed, K. Waites, et al. Evaluation of Vancomycin and Daptomycin Potency Trends (MIC Creep) against Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Isolates Collected in Nine U.S. Medical Centers from 2002 to 2006 Antimicrob. Agents Chemother., October 1, 2009; 53(10): 4127 - 4132. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. Krievins, R. Brandt, S. Hawser, P. Hadvary, and K. Islam Multicenter, Randomized Study of the Efficacy and Safety of Intravenous Iclaprim in Complicated Skin and Skin Structure Infections Antimicrob. Agents Chemother., July 1, 2009; 53(7): 2834 - 2840. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Kosowska-Shick, L. M. Ednie, P. McGhee, K. Smith, C. D. Todd, A. Wehler, and P. C. Appelbaum Incidence and Characteristics of Vancomycin Nonsusceptible Strains of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus at Hershey Medical Center Antimicrob. Agents Chemother., December 1, 2008; 52(12): 4510 - 4513. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. L. Pakyz, C. MacDougall, M. Oinonen, and R. E. Polk Trends in Antibacterial Use in US Academic Health Centers: 2002 to 2006 Arch Intern Med, November 10, 2008; 168(20): 2254 - 2260. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J.-I. Alos, A. Garcia-Canas, P. Garcia-Hierro, and F. Rodriguez-Salvanes Vancomycin MICs did not creep in Staphylococcus aureus isolates from 2002 to 2006 in a setting with low vancomycin usage J. Antimicrob. Chemother., October 1, 2008; 62(4): 773 - 775. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. Tattevin, C. Arvieux, and C. Michelet Alternative Agents for the Treatment of Invasive Infections Due to Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Strains With Reduced Susceptibility to Vancomycin Arch Intern Med, June 11, 2007; 167(11): 1206 - 1206. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||



