Skip Navigation

Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy 2005 56(Supplement 2):ii3-ii21; doi:10.1093/jac/dki297
This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Felmingham, D.
Right arrow Articles by Grüneberg, R. N.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Felmingham, D.
Right arrow Articles by Grüneberg, R. N.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2005. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the British Society for Antimicrobial Chemotherapy. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oupjournals.org

Supplement

The Alexander Project: the benefits from a decade of surveillance

David Felmingham1,*, Anthony R. White2, Michael R. Jacobs3, Peter C. Appelbaum4, James Poupard2, Linda A. Miller5 and Reuben N. Grüneberg1

1 GR Micro, Limited, 7–9 William Road, London NW1 3ER, UK; 2 GlaxoSmithKline, Harlow, UK; 3 Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, USA; 4 Hershey Medical Center, Hershey, PA, USA; 5 GlaxoSmithKline, Collegeville, PA, USA


* Corresponding author. Tel: +44-0-207-388-7320; Fax: +44-0-207-388-7324; E-mail: d.felmingham{at}grmicro.co.uk

The Alexander Project, initiated in 1992 as an international, multicentre, longitudinal surveillance study of antimicrobial susceptibility among common respiratory pathogens, has been pivotal in defining the role of global surveillance. At the time, there were few studies in which data were collected in a way that allowed meaningful comparisons to be made between studies, locations or over time. The project instituted the use of a central laboratory and standardized methods for the collection of isolates and determination of susceptibility, and this was continued with the addition of two further reference laboratories. Data from the study have provided a resource for measuring trends in the susceptibility patterns of Streptococcus pneumoniae, Haemophilus influenzae and Moraxella catarrhalis at country, regional and global levels. Determination and publication of quantitative MICs enabled detailed assessment of changes in susceptibility distributions and assessment of microbiological and potential clinical susceptibility using different breakpoints, including those based on pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic parameters. Comparisons of antimicrobial usage patterns and resistance prevalences over time allowed hypotheses to be examined with respect to the role of quantity and type of antimicrobial use in the selection and spread of resistance. The resulting collection of isolates has provided a valuable resource for molecular studies into the evolution of resistance over time and location; a substantial proportion of this collection is now in the public domain. This paper reviews the 10 years of the Alexander Project and the benefits it has brought to an understanding of the evolution of antibacterial resistance in community respiratory bacteria.

Keywords: Streptococcus pneumoniae , Haemophilus influenzae , Moraxella catarrhalis , antimicrobial resistance , antimicrobial consumption and appropriate use , pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics , susceptibility breakpoints


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Infect. Immun.Home page
H. Yesilkaya, F. Spissu, S. M. Carvalho, V. S. Terra, K. A. Homer, R. Benisty, N. Porat, A. R. Neves, and P. W. Andrew
Pyruvate Formate Lyase Is Required for Pneumococcal Fermentative Metabolism and Virulence
Infect. Immun., December 1, 2009; 77(12): 5418 - 5427.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.Home page
L. McGee, D. Biek, Y. Ge, M. Klugman, M. du Plessis, A. M. Smith, B. Beall, C. G. Whitney, and K. P. Klugman
In Vitro Evaluation of the Antimicrobial Activity of Ceftaroline against Cephalosporin-Resistant Isolates of Streptococcus pneumoniae
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother., February 1, 2009; 53(2): 552 - 556.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Antimicrob ChemotherHome page
A. P. MacGowan and on behalf of the BSAC Working Parties on Resistanc
Clinical implications of antimicrobial resistance for therapy
J. Antimicrob. Chemother., November 1, 2008; 62(suppl_2): ii105 - ii114.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Antimicrob ChemotherHome page
J. Flamaing, J. Verhaegen, J. Vandeven, N. Verbiest, and W. E. Peetermans
Pneumococcal bacteraemia in Belgium (1994 2004): the pre-conjugate vaccine era
J. Antimicrob. Chemother., January 1, 2008; 61(1): 143 - 149.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Infect. Immun.Home page
T. T. Tan, J. J. Christensen, M. H. Dziegiel, A. Forsgren, and K. Riesbeck
Comparison of the Serological Responses to Moraxella catarrhalis Immunoglobulin D-Binding Outer Membrane Protein and the Ubiquitous Surface Proteins A1 and A2
Infect. Immun., November 1, 2006; 74(11): 6377 - 6386.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.