Skip Navigation


JAC Advance Access originally published online on October 4, 2005
Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy 2005 56(6):1160-1162; doi:10.1093/jac/dki363
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
56/6/1160    most recent
dki363v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (1)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Sakka, V.
Right arrow Articles by Giamarellou, H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Sakka, V.
Right arrow Articles by Giamarellou, H.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2005. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the British Society for Antimicrobial Chemotherapy. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Successful moxifloxacin prophylaxis against experimental streptococcal aortic valve endocarditis

Vissaria Sakka1, Lambrini Galani1, Angelos Pefanis2,*, Dimitrios Iliopoulos3,4, George Athanasopoulos1, Ismini Donta3,4 and Helen Giamarellou1

1 4th Department of Internal Medicine, General Hospital ‘Attikon’, University of Athens, Medical School, Athens, Greece; 2 3rd Department of Internal Medicine, General Hospital ‘Sotiria’, University of Athens, Medical School, 152 Mesogion Avenue 11527, Athens, Greece; 3 Laboratory of Experimental Surgery and Surgical Research, General Hospital ‘Laikon’, University of Athens, Medical School, Athens, Greece; 4 2nd Department of Propedeutic Surgery, General Hospital ‘Laikon’, University of Athens, Medical School, Athens, Greece

Received 10 July 2005; returned 13 August 2005; revised 1 September 2005; accepted 13 September 2005


* Corresponding author. Tel: +30-1-9582565; Fax: +30-1-7778838; E-mail: apefan{at}med.uoa.gr

Objectives: Studies related to the prophylactic efficacy of fluoroquinolones against infective endocarditis are scarce. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of moxifloxacin, a quinolone active in vitro against Gram-positive cocci, in preventing streptococcal aortic valve endocarditis.

Methods: Non-bacterial thrombotic endocarditis of the aortic valve was induced by the insertion of a polyethylene catheter. Twenty-four hours later, rabbits were randomly assigned to a control group, and groups receiving either two doses of ampicillin (40 mg/kg, intravenously), 2 h apart, or a single dose of moxifloxacin (15 mg/kg, intravenously). Ampicillin and moxifloxacin were administered 0.5 and 1 h, respectively, prior to the intravenous inoculation of 107 cfu of Streptococcus oralis.

Results: Eighty-nine percent of the control animals developed infected vegetations. In rabbits challenged with this very high inoculum, moxifloxacin and ampicillin prevented endocarditis in 80% (P < 0.001 versus controls) and in 50% (P = 0.022 versus controls) of animals, respectively. The difference between ampicillin and moxifloxacin was not statistically significant (P = 0.128).

Conclusions: Moxifloxacin was at least as effective as ampicillin in preventing streptococcal endocarditis.

Keywords: Streptococcus oralis , fluoroquinolones , rabbits , ampicillin


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
JDRHome page
I. T. Carmona, P. Diz Dios, and C. Scully
Efficacy of Antibiotic Prophylactic Regimens for the Prevention of Bacterial Endocarditis of Oral Origin
Journal of Dental Research, December 1, 2007; 86(12): 1142 - 1159.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.