Skip Navigation


JAC Advance Access originally published online on August 30, 2005
Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy 2005 56(4):686-691; doi:10.1093/jac/dki309
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
56/4/686    most recent
dki309v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Halbert, L. W.
Right arrow Articles by Geiger-Zwald, A. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Halbert, L. W.
Right arrow Articles by Geiger-Zwald, A. M.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2005. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the British Society for Antimicrobial Chemotherapy. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Comparison of automated microbroth dilution and agar dilution for antimicrobial susceptibility of Campylobacter jejuni isolated from dairy sources

Lisa W. Halbert1, John B. Kaneene1,*, Linda S. Mansfield1, Pamela L. Ruegg2, Lorin D. Warnick3, Scott J. Wells4, Chuck P. Fossler5, Amy M. Campbell1 and Angela M. Geiger-Zwald2

1 Population Medicine Center, College of Veterinary Medicine, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824, USA; 2 Department of Dairy Science, College of Agriculture and Life Sciences, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI 53706, USA; 3 Department of Population Medicine and Diagnostic Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853, USA; 4 Department of Clinical and Population Science, College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Minnesota, St Paul, MN 55108, USA; 5 Centers for Epidemiology and Animal Health, USDA-APHIS-VS, Fort Collins, CO 80526-8117, USA

Received 21 April 2005; returned 21 June 2005; revised 25 July 2005; accepted 7 August 2005


* Corresponding author. Tel: +1-517-353-5941; Fax: +1-517-432-0976; E-mail: Kaneene{at}cvm.msu.edu

Objectives: To compare the agreement between microbroth dilution and agar dilution for antimicrobial susceptibility testing of Campylobacter jejuni.

Methods: Utilizing commercially prepared antimicrobial panels, microbroth dilution was compared with agar dilution for determining antimicrobial susceptibility in C. jejuni isolates. To assess the performance of both techniques for ampicillin, 190 C. jejuni isolates from dairy cattle were utilized. A group of 172 C. jejuni isolates from dairy sources were used to compare the susceptibility to ciprofloxacin, erythromycin, nalidixic acid and tetracycline.

Results: Our results indicate that microbroth dilution and agar dilution agree within ±1 log2 dilution for 86.7% of the isolates tested. Ciprofloxacin had the highest level of agreement for isolates tested by both techniques, resulting in a kappa of 0.886 and 97.1% agreement ±1 log2 dilution. The least agreement was observed in determining the susceptibility of isolates to ampicillin and erythromycin (82.1 and 79.7% agreement ±1 log2 dilution). However, kappa statistics were considered to have good agreement for these antimicrobials. There were no significant differences in the summary statistics for any of the five antimicrobials evaluated for the isolates analysed by the percentage of resistant isolates, MIC50, MIC75 or MIC90 beyond ±1 log2 dilution. There was no association in the classification of resistance by the testing methods employed. We also demonstrated that the quality control strain of C. jejuni ATCC 33650 performed in a consistent manner for both agar dilution and microbroth dilution.

Conclusions: Microbroth dilution may be an acceptable alternative to agar dilution for determining susceptibility of C. jejuni in research or surveillance where flow of samples, labour efficiency and cost may restrict the use of agar dilution.

Keywords: antibiotic resistance , epidemiological surveillance , C. jejuni


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Clin. Microbiol.Home page
T. Luangtongkum, T. Y. Morishita, A. B. El-Tayeb, A. J. Ison, and Q. Zhang
Comparison of Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing of Campylobacter spp. by the Agar Dilution and the Agar Disk Diffusion Methods
J. Clin. Microbiol., February 1, 2007; 45(2): 590 - 594.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.