Skip Navigation


JAC Advance Access originally published online on July 1, 2005
Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy 2005 56(2):287-291; doi:10.1093/jac/dki227
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
56/2/287    most recent
dki227v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (6)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Mateo, M.
Right arrow Articles by Prieto, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Mateo, M.
Right arrow Articles by Prieto, J.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2005. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the British Society for Antimicrobial Chemotherapy. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oupjournals.org

Genotypic versus phenotypic characterization, with respect to susceptibility and identification, of 17 clinical isolates of Staphylococcus lugdunensis

María Mateo1, Juan-Ramón Maestre1, Lorenzo Aguilar2, Fabio Cafini2, Pilar Puente1, Paloma Sánchez1, Luis Alou2, María-José Giménez2 and José Prieto2,*

1 Microbiology Department, Hospital Gómez-Ulla, Gta. del Ejército s/n, 28007 Madrid, Spain; 2 Microbiology Department, School of Medicine, Universidad Complutense, Avda. Complutense s/n, 28040 Madrid, Spain

Received 4 February 2005; returned 24 May 2005; revised 30 May 2005; accepted 2 June 2005


* Corresponding author. Tel: +34-91-3941508; Fax: +34-91-3941511; E-mail: jprieto{at}med.ucm.es

Objectives: To compare different methods for the identification and determination of susceptibility to penicillin and methicillin of Staphylococcus lugdunensis.

Methods: Seventeen clinical isolates of S. lugdunensis (identified by PCR amplification and sequencing of the rpoB gene) were studied using the ATB32-Staph, Crystal, Vitek 2 and Wider commercial systems. The clumping factor test and the tube coagulase test were also performed. ß-Lactamase production was studied by chromogenic methods. Methicillin resistance was phenotypically studied by the MRSA slide latex agglutination test, growth in MRSA agar, and the Vitek 2 and Wider systems (based on oxacillin MIC), and genotypically studied by detection of the mecA gene by PCR.

Results: The clumping factor test was negative in 35.3% of strains. All isolates were correctly identified to species level by the ATB32-Staph system. Species misidentification rates were 5.9%, 23.5% and 29.4% with the Crystal, the Vitek 2 and the Wider systems, respectively, mostly as Staphylococcus haemolyticus. ß-Lactamase was present in 11.8% of strains. Whereas 76.5% and 47.1% of strains exhibited oxacillin resistance (MIC range 0.5–2 mg/L) by the Vitek 2 system and the Wider system, respectively, none of the strains was positive in the MRSA slide latex agglutination test or grew in MRSA agar. All strains lacked the mecA gene.

Conclusions: The clumping factor test and some commercial systems may misidentify S. lugdunensis. Oxacillin resistance detected by commercial systems is not indicative of the presence of the mecA gene. These facts, together with ß-lactamase production, may preclude adequate treatment of infections by this virulent coagulase-negative Staphylococcus.

Keywords: S. lugdunensis , methicillin resistance , ß-lactamases , mecA gene , clumping factor


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Clin. Microbiol.Home page
T. Y. Tan, S. Y. Ng, and J. He
Microbiological Characteristics, Presumptive Identification, and Antibiotic Susceptibilities of Staphylococcus lugdunensis
J. Clin. Microbiol., July 1, 2008; 46(7): 2393 - 2395.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Microbiol. Rev.Home page
K. L. Frank, J. L. del Pozo, and R. Patel
From Clinical Microbiology to Infection Pathogenesis: How Daring To Be Different Works for Staphylococcus lugdunensis
Clin. Microbiol. Rev., January 1, 2008; 21(1): 111 - 133.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.Home page
K. L. Frank, E. J. Reichert, K. E. Piper, and R. Patel
In Vitro Effects of Antimicrobial Agents on Planktonic and Biofilm Forms of Staphylococcus lugdunensis Clinical Isolates
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother., March 1, 2007; 51(3): 888 - 895.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.