Skip Navigation


JAC Advance Access originally published online on June 7, 2005
Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy 2005 56(1):104-109; doi:10.1093/jac/dki186
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
56/1/104    most recent
dki186v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Baltch, A. L.
Right arrow Articles by Ritz, W. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Baltch, A. L.
Right arrow Articles by Ritz, W. J.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Published by Oxford University Press 2005

Antibacterial activities of gemifloxacin, levofloxacin, gatifloxacin, moxifloxacin and erythromycin against intracellular Legionella pneumophila and Legionella micdadei in human monocytes

Aldona L. Baltch1,2,*, Lawrence H. Bopp1, Raymond P. Smith1,2, Phyllis B. Michelsen1,2 and William J. Ritz1,2

1 Infectious Disease Section, Stratton VA Medical Center, Albany, NY, USA; 2 Albany Medical College, Albany, NY, USA

Received 10 December 2004; returned 22 February 2005; revised 10 March 2005; accepted 9 May 2005

* Correspondence address. Infectious Disease Research, 111D, Stratton VA Medical Center, 113 Holland Avenue, Albany, NY 12208, USA. Tel: +1-518-626-6416; Fax: +1-518-626-6564; E-mail: aldona.baltch{at}med.va.gov

Objectives: The antibacterial activity of a new fluoroquinolone, gemifloxacin, was tested against intracellular Legionella pneumophila and Legionella micdadei and was compared with the activities of levofloxacin, gatifloxacin, moxifloxacin and erythromycin.

Methods: For intracellular assays, bacteria were used to infect human monocyte-derived macrophages prepared from heparinized blood of healthy volunteers. Antibiotics were added following phagocytosis. Numbers of viable bacteria were determined at 0, 24, 48, 72 and 96 h.

Results: The intracellular antibacterial activity of gemifloxacin was concentration- and time-dependent. All of the quinolones had similar activities against L. pneumophila and L. micdadei at 10 x MIC, but there were minor differences: at 24 h moxifloxacin was significantly more active than the other quinolones against L. pneumophila, while gemifloxacin was more active against L. micdadei (P < 0.01). All of the quinolones were markedly more active than erythromycin (P < 0.01). The antibacterial effect of gemifloxacin against L. pneumophila following drug removal at 24 h persisted for 72 h at 20 x MIC but not at 10 x MIC, while for L. micdadei the antibacterial effect persisted for 24 h at 10 x MIC.

Conclusions: All of the quinolones had similar activities against intracellular L. pneumophila and L. micdadei and were markedly more effective than erythromycin.

Keywords: Legionella spp. , in vitro models , fluoroquinolones , macrolides , phagocytes


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.Home page
I. Garcia, S. Ballesta, C. Murillo, E. J. Perea, and A. Pascual
Intracellular Penetration and Activity of DX-619 in Human Polymorphonuclear Leukocytes.
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother., September 1, 2006; 50(9): 3173 - 3174.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.