JAC Advance Access originally published online on April 27, 2005
Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy 2005 55(6):995-1002; doi:10.1093/jac/dki109
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Comparative evaluation of tigecycline and vancomycin, with and without rifampicin, in the treatment of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus experimental osteomyelitis in a rabbit model
1 Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO, USA; 2 Infectious Diseases Unit, Department of Internal Medicine, San Bortolo Hospital, Vicenza, Italy; 3 Department of Orthopedics and Rehabilitation, The University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, TX, USA
* Corresponding author. Tel: +1-573-882-7189; Fax: +1-573-882-1760; Email: calhounj{at}health.missouri.edu
Objectives: Staphylococcus aureus is the most common organism isolated in osteomyelitis. Methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) infections are particularly difficult to treat. We evaluated the efficacy of tigecycline and vancomycin with and without rifampicin in a rabbit model of MRSA osteomyelitis.
Methods: A 28 day antibiotic therapy with a subcutaneous injection of tigecycline (14 mg/kg twice daily), with and without oral rifampicin (40 mg/kg twice daily); or subcutaneous administration of vancomycin (30 mg/kg twice daily), with and without oral rifampicin (40 mg/kg twice daily) were compared. Osteomyelitis was induced with an intramedullary injection of 106 colony-forming units of MRSA. Infected rabbits were randomly divided into six groups: tigecycline, tigecycline with oral rifampicin, vancomycin, vancomycin with oral rifampicin, and no treatment control and tigecycline bone penetration groups. Treatment began 2 weeks after infection. After 4 weeks of therapy, the rabbits were left untreated for 2 weeks. Rabbits were then euthanized, and the tibias were harvested. The bones were cultured, and bacterial counts of MRSA were performed.
Results: Rabbits that received tigecycline and oral rifampicin therapy (n=14) showed a 100% infection clearance. Rabbits treated with tigecycline (n=10) showed a 90% clearance. Rabbits treated with vancomycin and oral rifampicin (n=10) also showed a 90% clearance. Rabbits treated with vancomycin (n=11) showed an 81.8% clearance. Untreated controls (n=15) demonstrated only a 26% clearance. For the tigecycline bone penetration group, the bone concentrations of tigecycline in the infected tibia were significantly higher than the non-infected ones.
Conclusions: Tigecycline may be an effective alternative to vancomycin in the treatment of MRSA osteomyelitis.
Keywords: MRSA , antibiotics , infections
![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
G. Amador, H. Gautier, V. Le Mabecque, A. F. Miegeville, G. Potel, J.-M. Bouler, P. Weiss, J. Caillon, and C. Jacqueline In Vivo Assessment of the Antimicrobial Activity of a Calcium-Deficient Apatite Vancomycin Drug Delivery System in a Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Rabbit Osteomyelitis Experimental Model Antimicrob. Agents Chemother., February 1, 2010; 54(2): 950 - 952. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. Vaudaux, B. Fleury, A. Gjinovci, E. Huggler, M. Tangomo-Bento, and D. P. Lew Comparison of Tigecycline and Vancomycin for Treatment of Experimental Foreign-Body Infection Due to Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Antimicrob. Agents Chemother., July 1, 2009; 53(7): 3150 - 3152. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. K. Gould, R. Brindle, P. R. Chadwick, A. P. Fraise, S. Hill, D. Nathwani, G. L. Ridgway, M. J. Spry, R. E. Warren, and on behalf of the MRSA Working Party of the British Guidelines (2008) for the prophylaxis and treatment of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) infections in the United Kingdom J. Antimicrob. Chemother., May 1, 2009; 63(5): 849 - 861. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. E. Bowker, A. R. Noel, and A. P. MacGowan Pharmacodynamics of Minocycline against Staphylococcus aureus in an In Vitro Pharmacokinetic Model Antimicrob. Agents Chemother., December 1, 2008; 52(12): 4370 - 4373. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L.-Y. Yin, J. H. Calhoun, J. K. Thomas, S. Shapiro, and A. Schmitt-Hoffmann Efficacies of Ceftobiprole Medocaril and Comparators in a Rabbit Model of Osteomyelitis Due to Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Antimicrob. Agents Chemother., May 1, 2008; 52(5): 1618 - 1622. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Perlroth, M. Kuo, J. Tan, A. S. Bayer, and L. G. Miller Adjunctive Use of Rifampin for the Treatment of Staphylococcus aureus Infections: A Systematic Review of the Literature Arch Intern Med, April 28, 2008; 168(8): 805 - 819. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Stanzani, F. Tumietto, M. B. Giannini, G. Bianchi, A. Nanetti, N. Vianelli, M. Arpinati, M. Giovannini, F. Bonifazi, G. Bandini, et al. Successful treatment of multi-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa osteomyelitis after allogeneic bone marrow transplantation with a combination of colistin and tigecycline J. Med. Microbiol., December 1, 2007; 56(12): 1692 - 1695. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||



