JAC Advance Access originally published online on April 28, 2005
Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy 2005 55(6):974-982; doi:10.1093/jac/dki120
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Effects of piperacillin/tazobactam on Clostridium difficile growth and toxin production in a human gut model
Department of Microbiology, University of Leeds and The General Infirmary, Old Medical School, Leeds LS1 3EX, UK
* Corresponding author. Tel: +44-113-392-6818; Fax: +44-113-233-5649; Email: mark.wilcox{at}leedsth.nhs.uk
Objectives: Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) is a major cause of morbidity in the nosocomial environment. Antimicrobial agents such as the third-generation cephalosporins, lincosamides and aminopenicillins are well known for their propensity to induce CDI, but the definitive reasons why remain to be elucidated. Despite their broad spectrum of activity against both aerobic and anaerobic bacteria, the ureidopenicillins remain a class of antimicrobials infrequently associated with the development of CDI.
Methods: We used a triple-stage chemostat model that simulates the human gut to study the effects of the ureidopenicillin/ß-lactamase inhibitor combination piperacillin/tazobactam on gut bacterial populations and C. difficile.
Results: Piperacillin/tazobactam rapidly reduced all enumerated gut bacterial populations (including bacteroides, bifidobacteria and lactobacilli) below the limits of detection by the end of the piperacillin/tazobactam instillation period. Despite such widespread disruption of gut bacterial populations, C. difficile populations remained principally as spores, with no sustained proliferation or high-level cytotoxin production observed.
Conclusions: Factors other than reduced colonization resistance must be responsible for determining whether CDI develops following antimicrobial administration. We believe the gut model is a promising approach for the study of C. difficile pathogenesis reflecting in vivo events likely to occur in CDI.
Keywords: colonization resistance , pathogenesis , germination , spores
![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
C. Deneve, C. Delomenie, M.-C. Barc, A. Collignon, and C. Janoir Antibiotics involved in Clostridium difficile-associated disease increase colonization factor gene expression J. Med. Microbiol., June 1, 2008; 57(6): 732 - 738. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Gerber, C. Walch, B. Loffler, K. Tischendorf, U. Reischl, and G. Ackermann Effect of sub-MIC concentrations of metronidazole, vancomycin, clindamycin and linezolid on toxin gene transcription and production in Clostridium difficile J. Med. Microbiol., June 1, 2008; 57(6): 776 - 783. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Freeman, S. D. Baines, K. Saxton, and M. H. Wilcox Effect of metronidazole on growth and toxin production by epidemic Clostridium difficile PCR ribotypes 001 and 027 in a human gut model J. Antimicrob. Chemother., July 1, 2007; 60(1): 83 - 91. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. D. Baines, K. Saxton, J. Freeman, and M. H. Wilcox Tigecycline does not induce proliferation or cytotoxin production by epidemic Clostridium difficile strains in a human gut model J. Antimicrob. Chemother., November 1, 2006; 58(5): 1062 - 1065. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Freeman, S. D. Baines, D. Jabes, and M. H. Wilcox Comparison of the efficacy of ramoplanin and vancomycin in both in vitro and in vivo models of clindamycin-induced Clostridium difficile infection J. Antimicrob. Chemother., October 1, 2005; 56(4): 717 - 725. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||

