Skip Navigation


JAC Advance Access originally published online on April 8, 2005
Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy 2005 55(6):958-964; doi:10.1093/jac/dki101
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
55/6/958    most recent
dki101v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (6)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Wasfy, M. O.
Right arrow Articles by Hajjeh, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Wasfy, M. O.
Right arrow Articles by Hajjeh, R.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Published by Oxford University Press 2005.

Antimicrobial susceptibility and serotype distribution of Streptococcus pneumoniae causing meningitis in Egypt, 1998–2003

Momtaz O. Wasfy1,*, Guillermo Pimentel1, Mohammed Abdel-Maksoud1, Kevin L. Russell2, Christopher P. Barrozo2, John D. Klena1, Kenneth Earhart1 and Rana Hajjeh1,3

1 U.S. Naval Medical Research Unit No. 3, Cairo, Egypt; 2 Naval Health Research Center, San Diego, CA, USA; 3 Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA


* Corresponding author. Tel: +20-2-348-0312; Fax: +20-2-342-7121; Email: wasfym{at}namru3.med.navy.mil

Objectives: To determine the antimicrobial susceptibility and serotype distribution of 205 isolates of Streptococcus pneumoniae, collected from the CSF of meningitis patients identified between 1998–2003, during sentinel meningitis surveillance in Egypt.

Methods: Antimicrobial susceptibility was evaluated against six antibiotics using disc diffusion and Etest methods. Serotyping was performed by latex agglutination and the Quellung test.

Results: Forty-nine percent of all isolates were found to be non-susceptible to penicillin (46% intermediate, MIC range 0.12–1.0 mg/L; 3% resistant, MIC = 2.0 mg/L), and 6% of the isolates were non-susceptible to ceftriaxone (5% intermediate, MIC = 1.0 mg/L; 1.3% resistant, MIC ≥ 2 mg/L). Resistance rates for tetracycline and trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole were high (52 and 59.7%, respectively), but those for erythromycin and chloramphenicol were lower (11 and 9%, respectively). Five serotypes (6B, 1, 19A, 23F and 6A) accounted for 37% of the total isolates. Ten isolates (5%) were non-typeable. Overall, 29 and 42% of serotypes were represented in the 7- and 11-valent conjugate vaccines, respectively. However, vaccine coverage for children <2 years was 38 and 56% for the 7- and 11-valent, respectively.

Conclusions: Resistance to penicillin may be increasing among S. pneumoniae strains causing meningitis in Egypt, and a moderate proportion of these strains are not covered by current pneumococcal conjugate vaccines. In addition to intensifying education efforts about judicious use of antibiotics, laboratory-based surveillance for other forms of invasive pneumococcal disease, especially pneumonia, is needed before decisions can be made regarding the most effective vaccines for control of this disease in Egypt.

Keywords: pneumococci , serotypes , surveillance , vaccines


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Clin. Microbiol.Home page
L.-A. S. Kirkham, J. M. C. Jefferies, A. R. Kerr, Y. Jing, S. C. Clarke, A. Smith, and T. J. Mitchell
Identification of Invasive Serotype 1 Pneumococcal Isolates That Express Nonhemolytic Pneumolysin
J. Clin. Microbiol., January 1, 2006; 44(1): 151 - 159.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.