Skip Navigation


JAC Advance Access originally published online on March 2, 2005
Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy 2005 55(4):506-510; doi:10.1093/jac/dki052
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
55/4/506    most recent
dki052v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (9)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Fernandes, C. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Fernandes, C. J.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2005. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the British Society for Antimicrobial Chemotherapy. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions{at}oupjournals.org

Cefoxitin resistance as a surrogate marker for the detection of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus

Clarence J. Fernandes1, Lorna A. Fernandes1, Peter Collignon2,* on behalf of the Australian Group on Antimicrobial Resistance (AGAR)

1 Department of Microbiology, Pacific Laboratory Medicine Services, Royal North Shore Hospital, St Leonards 2065; 2 Department of Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, The Canberra Hospital, Canberra, ACT 2606, Australia

* Corresponding author. Tel: +61-2-6244-2105; Fax: +61-2-6281-0349; Email: peter.collignon{at}act.gov.au

Objectives: To evaluate the usefulness of cefoxitin when used as a surrogate marker for the detection of methicillin resistance.

Patients and methods: Eight hundred and seventy-one strains of Staphylococcus aureus, collected from eight tertiary referral centres serving diverse socio-economic populations, were included in the study using NCCLS disc diffusion and the agar dilution methods.

Results: Using cefoxitin and NCCLS criteria for disc diffusion, the sensitivity and specificity for recognizing methicillin resistance were both 100%. Similar results were obtained when the strains were tested by the agar dilution method. The cefoxitin MICs for methicillin-susceptible strains were ≤ 4 mg/L.

Conclusions: Testing with cefoxitin as a surrogate marker for the detection of methicillin resistance was very accurate with both disc diffusion and agar dilution methods. Such testing clearly distinguished methicillin-resistant strains of S. aureus from methicillin-susceptible strains.

Keywords: community-onset MRSA infections , hospital-acquired infections , non-multiresistant Staphylococcus aureus , oxacillin resistance


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 J Med MicrobiolHome page
L. R. R. Perez, C. Dias, and P. A. d'Azevedo
Agar dilution and agar screen with cefoxitin and oxacillin: what is known and what is unknown in detection of meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus
J. Med. Microbiol., August 1, 2008; 57(8): 954 - 956.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J. Clin. Pathol.Home page
B V S Krishna, M Smith, A McIndeor, A P Gibb, and J Dave
Evaluation of Chromogenic MRSA medium, MRSASelect and Oxacillin Resistance Screening Agar for the detection of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus
J. Clin. Pathol., July 1, 2008; 61(7): 841 - 843.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J. Clin. Microbiol.Home page
R. Skov, R. Smyth, A. R. Larsen, A. Bolmstrom, A. Karlsson, K. Mills, N. Frimodt-Moller, and G. Kahlmeter
Phenotypic Detection of Methicillin Resistance in Staphylococcus aureus by Disk Diffusion Testing and Etest on Mueller-Hinton Agar
J. Clin. Microbiol., December 1, 2006; 44(12): 4395 - 4399.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.