Skip Navigation


JAC Advance Access originally published online on November 5, 2004
Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy 2004 54(6):1127-1129; doi:10.1093/jac/dkh476
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
54/6/1127    most recent
dkh476v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by O'Neill, A. J.
Right arrow Articles by Chopra, I.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by O'Neill, A. J.
Right arrow Articles by Chopra, I.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

JAC vol.54 no.6 © The British Society for Antimicrobial Chemotherapy 2004; all rights reserved

Comparison of assays for detection of agents causing membrane damage in Staphylococcus aureus

Alexander John O'Neill1, Keith Miller1, Brunello Oliva2 and Ian Chopra1,*

1 Antimicrobial Research Centre and School of Biochemistry and Microbiology, University of Leeds, Leeds LS2 9JT, UK; 2 Department of Experimental Medicine, University of L'Aquila, Coppito—67100, L'Aquila, Italy

* Corresponding author. Tel: +44-113-233-5604; Fax: +44-113-233-5638; Email: i.chopra{at}leeds.ac.uk

Objectives: To develop a novel ß-galactosidase leakage assay for Staphylococcus aureus and to evaluate this alongside other simple methods for detection of agents that cause membrane damage in staphylococci.

Methods: Using a PCR-based approach, a derivative of S. aureus RN4220 was constructed carrying the Escherichia coli lacZ gene under the control of the strong staphylococcal promoter, cap1A. Leakage of ß-galactosidase (BG) from this strain was examined after exposure for 10 min to various membrane-damaging agents at 4xMIC, using a fluorescence assay and the substrate 4-methylumbelliferyl-ß-D-galactoside. Other assays for membrane damage involving protoplast lysis (PL), leakage of material absorbing at 260 nm (OD) and ATP release as well as the BacLight (BL) assay were carried out using established methods.

Results: All the assays, with the exception of the PL assay, detected membrane damage induced by cetyltrimethylammonium bromide, nisin, clofazimine and protegrin IB-367. However, the ability to detect membrane damage induced by these agents differed between the assay systems. The assays also varied considerably in their signal-to-noise ratio, with the ATP assay providing values for nisin approaching 100-fold that of the control.

Conclusions: The PL assay is unsuitable for detection of membrane-damaging agents in S. aureus. The other assays, including the BG assay, detect membrane damage. The OD assay should be sufficient for most purposes since it is effective, rapid and cheap to perform. Studies requiring maximum sensitivity and discrimination should employ the ATP assay.

Keywords: membrane perturbation , protoplasts , fluorescent dyes , ATP , ß-galactosidase , components absorbing at 260 nm


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 J Med MicrobiolHome page
Y. Qu, T. S. Istivan, A. J. Daley, D. A. Rouch, and M. A. Deighton
Comparison of various antimicrobial agents as catheter lock solutions: preference for ethanol in eradication of coagulase-negative staphylococcal biofilms
J. Med. Microbiol., April 1, 2009; 58(4): 442 - 450.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J Antimicrob ChemotherHome page
J. K. Hobbs, K. Miller, A. J. O'Neill, and I. Chopra
Consequences of daptomycin-mediated membrane damage in Staphylococcus aureus
J. Antimicrob. Chemother., November 1, 2008; 62(5): 1003 - 1008.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.Home page
R. Steidl, S. Pearson, R. E. Stephenson, N. Ledala, S. Sitthisak, B. J. Wilkinson, and R. K. Jayaswal
Staphylococcus aureus Cell Wall Stress Stimulon Gene-lacZ Fusion Strains: Potential for Use in Screening for Cell Wall-Active Antimicrobials
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother., August 1, 2008; 52(8): 2923 - 2925.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J Biomol ScreenHome page
S. P. Falk, A. T. Ulijasz, and B. Weisblum
Differential Assay for High-Throughput Screening of Antibacterial Compounds
J Biomol Screen, December 1, 2007; 12(8): 1102 - 1108.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
K. C. Rice, E. E. Mann, J. L. Endres, E. C. Weiss, J. E. Cassat, M. S. Smeltzer, and K. W. Bayles
The cidA murein hydrolase regulator contributes to DNA release and biofilm development in Staphylococcus aureus
PNAS, May 8, 2007; 104(19): 8113 - 8118.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.Home page
S. Gardete, S. W. Wu, S. Gill, and A. Tomasz
Role of VraSR in Antibiotic Resistance and Antibiotic-Induced Stress Response in Staphylococcus aureus.
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother., October 1, 2006; 50(10): 3424 - 3434.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 MicrobiologyHome page
S. Gardete, H. de Lencastre, and A. Tomasz
A link in transcription between the native pbpB and the acquired mecA gene in a strain of Staphylococcus aureus.
Microbiology, September 1, 2006; 152(Pt 9): 2549 - 2558.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J Antimicrob ChemotherHome page
M. C. Cholo, H. I. Boshoff, H. C. Steel, R. Cockeran, N. M. Matlola, K. J. Downing, V. Mizrahi, and R. Anderson
Effects of clofazimine on potassium uptake by a Trk-deletion mutant of Mycobacterium tuberculosis
J. Antimicrob. Chemother., January 1, 2006; 57(1): 79 - 84.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.