Skip Navigation


JAC Advance Access originally published online on October 14, 2004
Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy 2004 54(6):1067-1071; doi:10.1093/jac/dkh452
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
54/6/1067    most recent
dkh452v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (2)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Cha, R.
Right arrow Articles by Rybak, M. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Cha, R.
Right arrow Articles by Rybak, M. J.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

JAC vol.54 no.6 © The British Society for Antimicrobial Chemotherapy 2004; all rights reserved

Pulsatile delivery of amoxicillin against Streptococcus pneumoniae

Raymond Cha1,2 and Michael J. Rybak1,2,*

1 Anti-Infective Research Laboratory, Eugene Applebaum College of Pharmacy and Health Sciences and 2 School of Medicine, Wayne State University, Detroit, MI, USA

* Correspondence address. Anti-Infective Research Laboratory, Eugene Applebaum College of Pharmacy and Health Sciences, Wayne State University, 259 Mack Ave., Detroit, MI 48201, USA. Tel: +1-313-577-4376; Fax: +1-313-577-8915; Email: m.rybak{at}wayne.edu

Objective: ß-Lactam antimicrobials are dosed intermittently or continuously based on their short half-lives and concentration-independent activity. Based on the relationship between antimicrobial killing and bacterial growth cycle, the pharmacodynamics of a unique pulsatile strategy was investigated.

Methods: In vitro pharmacodynamic models with initial inocula of 6 log10 cfu/mL were utilized to simulate amoxicillin regimens against two Streptococcus pneumoniae isolates: 16891 (MIC = 4 mg/L) and ATCC 49150 (MIC = 0.016 mg/L). Time–kill profiles of pulsatile dosing of amoxicillin (total daily dose fractionated equally and given at 0, 2, 4 and 6 h for each 24 h cycle) were compared with regimens of every 8 h and every 12 h with the same 24 h drug exposure. Each regimen targeted cumulative peak concentrations of 30, 15 and 5 mg/L for each 24 h cycle. A t1/2 of 1 h was simulated for all experiments. Bacterial density was quantified over 96 h.

Results: Against 16891, every 8 h and every 12 h regimens exhibited minimal bacterial kill at all dosing levels. In contrast, pulsatile dosing at 30 mg/L/24 h resulted in an initial modest ~1 log10 cfu/mL kill with regrowth to growth control levels at 24 h but was immediately followed by a rapid ~2 log10 cfu/mL kill by 32 h. This pattern of kill and regrowth repeated at the same magnitude for each 24 h cycle for the 96 h study duration. Against the susceptible strain (ATCC 49150), both pulse and traditional dosing of amoxicillin resulted in rapid and significant kill to our detection limits for the entire study duration. A pattern of kill and regrowth was only observed at the lowest dose (0.05 mg/L) against ATCC 49150. At therapeutic levels, all regimens rapidly achieved undetectable limits against this strain for the study duration. No significant alterations in post-exposure MICs were noted. Overall bacterial density reduction was similar between the regimens for the susceptible isolate and greater with pulsatile regimens against the less susceptible strain.

Conclusion: Pulsatile dosing, which involves administration of the total daily dose over the first 6 h of the day, may represent a unique and alternative strategy for dosing ß-lactam antimicrobials.

Keywords: pharmacodynamics , intermediate resistance , controlled drug release , in vitro models


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.Home page
K. D. Leuthner, C. M. Cheung, and M. J. Rybak
Pulsatile Delivery of Clarithromycin Alone or in Combination with Amoxicillin against Streptococcus pneumoniae
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother., February 1, 2006; 50(2): 813 - 816.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Antimicrob ChemotherHome page
H. K. Sun, S. Y. Lee, M. A. Banevicius, X. Du, D. Maglio, and D. P. Nicolau
Efficacy of pulsatile amoxicillin and clarithromycin dosing alone and in combination in a murine pneumococcal pneumonia model
J. Antimicrob. Chemother., September 1, 2005; 56(3): 559 - 565.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.