JAC Advance Access originally published online on July 8, 2004
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy 2004 54(2):360-363; doi:10.1093/jac/dkh350
JAC vol.54 no.2 © The British Society for Antimicrobial Chemotherapy 2004; all rights reserved.
Vancomycin-induced deletion of the methicillin resistance gene mecA in Staphylococcus aureus
1 Department of Microbiology, Otago School of Medical Sciences, University of Otago, P.O. Box 56, Dunedin, New Zealand; 2 Department of Medical Microbiology, University of Zürich, CH-8028, Zürich, Switzerland
* Corresponding author. Tel: +64-3-479-7722; Fax: +64-3-479-8540; Email: greg.cook{at}stonebow.otago.ac.nz
Objective: To elucidate factors that contribute to the development of vancomycin resistance in methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA).
Methods: Forty-nine MRSA isolates were subjected to passage selection with vancomycin to isolate mutants with reduced susceptibility to vancomycin. One mutant was chosen for detailed molecular and biochemical characterization.
Results: Five vancomycin-resistant mutants (vancomycin MICs, 612 mg/L) were obtained in vitro from five MRSA parent isolates. Upon acquisition of vancomycin resistance, all mutants showed a concomitant decrease in oxacillin resistance. In one particular MRSA strain, selection for vancomycin resistance repeatedly produced deletions and rearrangements, including loss of the mecA gene. Pleiotropic phenotypical changes, such as yellow pigment formation, loss of haemolysis, thickened cell wall, increased resistance to lysostaphin and reduced cell wall turnover were observed in this mutant.
Conclusion: Acquisition of vancomycin resistance in one MRSA strain triggered mecA deletion suggesting that this deletion, coupled to other rearrangements and/or mutations, may be responsible for the increased vancomycin resistance phenotype.
Keywords: MRSA , staphylococci , vancomycin resistance , S. aureus
![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
N. N. Mishra, S.-J. Yang, A. Sawa, A. Rubio, C. C. Nast, M. R. Yeaman, and A. S. Bayer Analysis of Cell Membrane Characteristics of In Vitro-Selected Daptomycin-Resistant Strains of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Antimicrob. Agents Chemother., June 1, 2009; 53(6): 2312 - 2318. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. Francois, I. Uckay, A. Iten, G. Renzi, S. Dahran, V. Camus, H. Sax, and J. Schrenzel In Vivo Detection of Clonally Derived Methicillin-Resistant/Methicillin-Susceptible Staphylococcus aureus Strains Is Not a Rare Event J. Clin. Microbiol., May 1, 2008; 46(5): 1890 - 1891. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. J. Noto, P. M. Fox, and G. L. Archer Spontaneous Deletion of the Methicillin Resistance Determinant, mecA, Partially Compensates for the Fitness Cost Associated with High-Level Vancomycin Resistance in Staphylococcus aureus Antimicrob. Agents Chemother., April 1, 2008; 52(4): 1221 - 1229. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Daskalaki, J. R. Otero, F. Sanz, and F. Chaves Bacteremia Due to Clonally Derived Methicillin-Resistant, Gentamicin-Susceptible Isolates and Methicillin-Susceptible, Gentamicin-Resistant Isolates of Staphylococcus aureus J. Clin. Microbiol., October 1, 2007; 45(10): 3446 - 3448. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. Perichon and P. Courvalin Synergism between {beta}-Lactams and Glycopeptides against VanA-Type Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus and Heterologous Expression of the vanA Operon Antimicrob. Agents Chemother., November 1, 2006; 50(11): 3622 - 3630. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. Sendi, P. Graber, and W. Zimmerli Loss of mecA gene in Staphylococcus epidermidis after prolonged therapy with vancomycin J. Antimicrob. Chemother., October 1, 2005; 56(4): 794 - 795. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. N. Steenbergen, J. Alder, G. M. Thorne, and F. P. Tally Daptomycin: a lipopeptide antibiotic for the treatment of serious Gram-positive infections J. Antimicrob. Chemother., March 1, 2005; 55(3): 283 - 288. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||


