Skip Navigation


JAC Advance Access originally published online on June 16, 2004
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
54/1/46    most recent
dkh245v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (4)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Parveen, M.
Right arrow Articles by Iwahashi, H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Parveen, M.
Right arrow Articles by Iwahashi, H.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy 2004 54(1):46-55; doi:10.1093/jac/dkh245
JAC vol.54 no.1 © The British Society for Antimicrobial Chemotherapy 2004; all rights reserved.

Response of Saccharomyces cerevisiae to a monoterpene: evaluation of antifungal potential by DNA microarray analysis

Meher Parveen1,2, Md. Kamrul Hasan3, Junko Takahashi4, Yoshinori Murata5, Emiko Kitagawa2, Osamu Kodama1 and Hitoshi Iwahashi2,*

1 United Graduate School of Agricultural Science, Tokyo University of Agriculture and Technology, 3–5–8 Saiwai, Fuchu, Tokyo 183; 2 Research Institute of Biological Resources, 3 Gene Function Research Center, 5 International Patent Organism Depository, National Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology (AIST), Central 6, Higashi 1–1-1, Tsukuba, Ibaraki 305–8566; 4 Daikin Environmental Laboratory, Ltd. 3 Banchi, Miyukigaoka, Tsukuba-shi, Ibaraki, 305–0841 Japan

* Corresponding author. Tel: +81-298-61-6059; Fax: +81-298-61-6066; E-mail: hitoshi.iwahashi{at}aist.go.jp

Plant-derived essential oils with monoterpenoids have been used as antifungal drugs since ancient times, but the mode of action of these natural hydrocarbons at the molecular level is not understood. In order to understand the mechanisms of toxicity of {alpha}-terpinene (a cyclic monoterpene), a culture of Saccharomyces cerevisiae was exposed to 0.02% {alpha}-terpinene for 2 h and transcript profiles were obtained using yeast DNA arrays. These profiles, when compared with transcript profiles of untreated cultures, revealed that the expression of 793 genes was affected. For 435 genes, mRNA levels in treated cells compared with control cells differed by more than two-fold, whereas for 358 genes, it was <0.5-fold. Northern blots were performed for selected genes to verify the microarray results. Functional analysis of the up-regulated genes indicates that, similar to commonly used antifungal drugs, {alpha}-terpinene exposure affected genes involved in ergosterol biosynthesis and sterol uptake. In addition, transcriptional induction of genes related to lipid metabolism, cell wall structure and function, detoxification and cellular transport was observed in response to terpinene toxicity. Notably, the functions of 192 up-regulated genes are still unknown, but their characterization will probably shed light on the mechanisms of drug resistance and sensitivity. Taken together, this study showed that {alpha}-terpinene has strong antifungal activities and its modes of action resemble those of presently used antifungal drugs.

Keywords: essential oils , ergosterol , stress response , toxicity , genomic expression


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev.Home page
G. N. Vemuri and A. A. Aristidou
Metabolic Engineering in the -omics Era: Elucidating and Modulating Regulatory Networks
Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev., June 1, 2005; 69(2): 197 - 216.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.