Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Wells, W. G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Wells, W. G.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?


Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy (2004) 53, ii67-ii74
© 2004 The British Society for Antimicrobial Chemotherapy


Supplement

Treatment of complicated urinary tract infection in adults: combined analysis of two randomized, double-blind, multicentre trials comparing ertapenem and ceftriaxone followed by appropriate oral therapy

Wilbur G. Wells1, Gail L. Woods2,*, Qi Jiang2,§ and Richard M. Gesser2 for the Protocol 014 and 021 Study Groups{ddagger}

1 Alabama Research Center, Birmingham, AL, USA; 2 Merck Research Laboratories, West Point, PA, USA

Abstract

The efficacy and safety of parenteral ertapenem, a Group 1 carbapenem, 1 g once a day, for the treatment of complicated urinary tract infections (UTIs; i.e. acute pyelonephritis, UTI in men, or UTI associated with obstruction, foreign body or a urological abnormality interfering with normal voiding) in adults, were compared with those of parenteral ceftriaxone, 1 g once a day, in two similarly designed prospective, double-blind, randomized studies. In both studies, patients could be switched to an oral agent after >=3 days of parenteral study therapy. At entry, 850 patients were stratified according to whether they had acute pyelonephritis or other complicated UTI without acute pyelonephritis. Two hundred and fifty-six patients in the ertapenem group and 224 in the ceftriaxone group were microbiologically evaluable. Ninety-six per cent of these patients were switched to oral therapy, usually ciprofloxacin; the median (range) duration of parenteral and total therapy, respectively, was 4 (2–14) days and 13 (14–18) days for ertapenem and 4 (2–14) days and 13 (3–17) days for ceftriaxone. The most common pathogens were Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae, which accounted for 64.7% and 9.8% of isolates, respectively. At the primary efficacy endpoint 5–9 days after treatment, 229 (89.5%) patients who received ertapenem and 204 (91.1%) patients who received ceftriaxone had a favourable microbiological response (95% confidence interval, –7.4 to 4.0), indicating that outcomes in the two treatment groups were equivalent. Success rates in both treatment groups were similar when compared by stratum and severity of infection. The frequency and severity of drug-related adverse events were generally similar in both treatment groups. In this combined analysis, ertapenem was highly effective therapy for the treatment of complicated UTIs in adults with moderate-to-severe disease.

Keywords: acute pyelonephritis, carbapenems, antimicrobial agents, efficacy, safety

Footnotes

* Present address. Department of Pathology, University of Utah, ARUP Laboratories, 500 Chipeta Way, Salt Lake City, UT 84108, USA.

§ Present address: Novartis Pharmaceutical Corp., E. Hannover, NJ, USA.

Corresponding author. Merck & Co. Inc., BL3–4, PO Box 4, West Point, PA 19486-0004, USA. Tel: +1-484-344-3176; Fax: +1-484-344-3404; E-mail: richard_gesser{at}merck.com

{ddagger} Members of the study groups are listed in the Acknowledgements.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.