Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Wexler, H. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Wexler, H. M.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?


Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy (2004) 53, ii11-ii21
© 2004 The British Society for Antimicrobial Chemotherapy


Supplement

In vitro activity of ertapenem: review of recent studies

Hannah M. Wexler*

GLA VA Healthcare System and UCLA School of Medicine, Los Angeles, CA, USA

Abstract

Ertapenem is a long-acting, 1ß-methyl parenteral Group 1 carbapenem antibiotic that has a broad antibacterial spectrum and once-a-day dosing supported by clinical studies. Ertapenem is active against both Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria, including Enterobacteriaceae, Streptococcus pneumoniae and most species of anaerobic bacteria. Isolates from a variety of infections (intra-abdominal infections, skin/soft-tissue infections, community-acquired pneumonia, pelvic infections and urinary tract infections) are inhibited by ertapenem. It has restricted activity against nosocomial pathogens such as Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Acinetobacter species, methicillin-resistant staphylococci and enterococci. Ertapenem has potent activity against the majority of anaerobic isolates from intra-abdominal infections, and against most of the aerobes isolated from these infections, with the exceptions of the nosocomial pathogens mentioned above. MIC90s for most species of Enterobacteriaceae were <1 mg/L, significantly lower than those of imipenem. MIC90s for most Bacteroides fragilis group isolates ranged from 1 to 4 mg/L, and MIC90s were species specific for Clostridium, ranging from 0.06 mg/L for Clostridium perfringens to 4 mg/L for Clostridium clostridioforme. Ertapenem was equivalent to or better than piperacillin–tazobactam in activity against most anaerobic species isolated from these infections, and was more potent than piperacillin–tazobactam and ceftriaxone against the most common skin pathogens (e.g. methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus). Ertapenem was highly active against most of the pathogens isolated from patients with community-acquired pneumonia, except for isolates of methicillin-resistant S. aureus (which are infrequent causes of community-acquired infection); these isolates were also resistant to ceftriaxone. Resistance to ertapenem is most commonly attributable to a variety of mechanisms including alterations in penicillin-binding proteins in Gram-positive organisms, and combinations of potent metallo-ß-lactamase enzymes, porin protein defects and efflux pumps in Gram-negative organisms.

Keywords: susceptibility, resistance, carbapenems, antimicrobial agents

Footnotes

* Correspondence address. Wadsworth Anaerobe Laboratory, GLA VA Healthcare System, 11301 Wilshire Boulevard. 691/151J, USA. Tel: +1-310-268-3404; Fax: +1-310-268-4458; E-mail: hwexler{at}ucla.edu


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.Home page
K. Tanaka, H. Mikamo, K. Nakao, T. Ichiishi, T. Goto, Y. Yamagishi, and K. Watanabe
In Vitro Activity of Tomopenem (CS-023/RO4908463) against Anaerobic Bacteria
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother., January 1, 2009; 53(1): 319 - 322.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Med MicrobiolHome page
K. V. d. Santos, J. R. Nicoli, W. A. Martins, S. C. Coutinho, A. C. M. Apolonio, C. G. Diniz, M. A. R. d. Carvalho, and L. d. M. Farias
Comparative activity of ertapenem and piperacillin tazobactam in a murine systemic infection model with Bacteroides fragilis and Escherichia coli
J. Med. Microbiol., November 1, 2007; 56(11): 1576 - 1579.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Antimicrob ChemotherHome page
E. Boselli, D. Breilh, S. Djabarouti, J. C. Bel, M. C. Saux, and B. Allaouchiche
Diffusion of ertapenem into bone and synovial tissues
J. Antimicrob. Chemother., October 1, 2007; 60(4): 893 - 896.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Med MicrobiolHome page
K. Valeria dos Santos, C. G. Diniz, S. C. Coutinho, A. C. M. Apolonio, L. Geralda de Sousa-Gaia, J. R. Nicoli, L. d. M. Farias, and M. A. Roque de Carvalho
In vitro activity of piperacillin/tazobactam and ertapenem against Bacteroides fragilis and Escherichia coli in pure and mixed cultures
J. Med. Microbiol., June 1, 2007; 56(6): 798 - 802.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.Home page
C. A. DeRyke, M. A. Banevicius, H. W. Fan, and D. P. Nicolau
Bactericidal Activities of Meropenem and Ertapenem against Extended-Spectrum-{beta}-Lactamase-Producing Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae in a Neutropenic Mouse Thigh Model
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother., April 1, 2007; 51(4): 1481 - 1486.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Microbiol.Home page
Y. A. Warren, K. L. Tyrrell, D. M. Citron, and E. J. C. Goldstein
Clostridium aldenense sp. nov. and Clostridium citroniae sp. nov. Isolated from Human Clinical Infections.
J. Clin. Microbiol., July 1, 2006; 44(7): 2416 - 2422.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.Home page
M. Chen, A. N. Nafziger, G. L. Drusano, L. Ma, and J. S. Bertino Jr.
Comparative pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamic target attainment of ertapenem in normal-weight, obese, and extremely obese adults.
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother., April 1, 2006; 50(4): 1222 - 1227.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.