JAC Advance Access originally published online on May 5, 2004
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy (2004) 53, 1039-1044
© 2004 The British Society for Antimicrobial Chemotherapy
Surveillance of susceptibility patterns in 1297 European and US anaerobic and capnophilic isolates to co-amoxiclav and five other antimicrobial agents
1 Laboratory Specialists, Inc., Cleveland, OH; 2 M. S. Hershey Medical Center, Hershey, PA; 3 R. M. Alden Research Laboratory, Santa Monica, CA, USA; 4 Institute für Medizinische Mikrobiologie und Infektionsepidemiologie der Universität Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany; 5 ADRINORD, Lille, France
Received 27 October 2003; returned 14 January 2004; revised 12 March 2004; accepted 22 March 2004
In vitro susceptibility data were collected for co-amoxiclav and other antimicrobial agents against 1297 recent anaerobe isolates collected in Europe and the USA. The co-amoxiclav (amoxicillin/clavulanic acid) MIC50/90s (amoxicillin/clavulanic acid concentration in a ratio of 2:1, expressed in terms of amoxicillin concentration in mg/L) were 0.5/4 for Bacteroides fragilis,
0.125/1 for Prevotella species,
0.125/0.25 for Fusobacterium nucleatum, 0.5/1 for Eikenella corrodens, 0.25/8 for Peptostreptococcus anaerobius,
0.125/0.5 for Micromonas (Peptostreptococcus) micros,
0.25/0.5 for Fingoldia (Peptostreptococcus) magna, and
0.125/0.125 for Porphyromonas species. The co-amoxiclav susceptibility rate for B. fragilis was 94.6%, for P. anaerobius 84.3% and for all other species tested 100%. These data indicate that co-amoxiclav remains an effective drug for the antimicrobial treatment and prophylaxis of many anaerobic infections. Among the comparator drugs, metronidazole was very active against all bacterial species (>96% susceptible) except E. corrodens (MIC50/90 of >32/>64 mg/L), which is a capnophilic organism. Imipenem was also highly active against all species (>98% susceptible). Levofloxacin and clindamycin were the least potent agents tested, particularly against Bacteroides, Prevotella and Peptostreptococcus (levofloxacin susceptibility rates: Bacteroides 72.7%, Prevotella 71.5%, F. magna 72.4%; clindamycin susceptibility rates: Bacteroides 79.5%, Prevotella 92.1%, F. magna 84.7%).
Keywords: amoxicillin/clavulanic acid, anaerobes, susceptibility data
* Corresponding author. Tel: +1-440-835-4458; Fax: +1-440-835-5786; E-mail: amdlmk{at}aol.com
![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
C.-Y. Liu, Y.-T. Huang, C.-H. Liao, L.-C. Yen, H.-Y. Lin, and P.-R. Hsueh Increasing Trends in Antimicrobial Resistance among Clinically Important Anaerobes and Bacteroides fragilis Isolates Causing Nosocomial Infections: Emerging Resistance to Carbapenems Antimicrob. Agents Chemother., September 1, 2008; 52(9): 3161 - 3168. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. Kononen, A. Bryk, P. Niemi, and A. Kanervo-Nordstrom Antimicrobial Susceptibilities of Peptostreptococcus anaerobius and the Newly Described Peptostreptococcus stomatis Isolated from Various Human Sources Antimicrob. Agents Chemother., June 1, 2007; 51(6): 2205 - 2207. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M.-F. Odou, C. Muller, L. Calvet, and L. Dubreuil In vitro activity against anaerobes of retapamulin, a new topical antibiotic for treatment of skin infections J. Antimicrob. Chemother., April 1, 2007; 59(4): 646 - 651. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Katsandri, J. Papaparaskevas, A. Pantazatou, G. L. Petrikkos, G. Thomopoulos, D. P. Houhoula, and A. Avlamis Two Cases of Infections Due to Multidrug-Resistant Bacteroides fragilis Group Strains J. Clin. Microbiol., September 1, 2006; 44(9): 3465 - 3467. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. Boyanova, R. Kolarov, G. Gergova, E. Deliverska, J. Madjarov, M. Marinov, and I. Mitov Anaerobic bacteria in 118 patients with deep-space head and neck infections from the University Hospital of Maxillofacial Surgery, Sofia, Bulgaria. J. Med. Microbiol., September 1, 2006; 55(Pt 9): 1285 - 1289. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||



