Skip Navigation


JAC Advance Access originally published online on March 3, 2004
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
53/4/646    most recent
dkh144v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (14)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Raad, I.
Right arrow Articles by Rolston, K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Raad, I.
Right arrow Articles by Rolston, K.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?


Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy (2004) 53, 646-649
© 2004 The British Society for Antimicrobial Chemotherapy

Prospective, randomized study comparing quinupristin–dalfopristin with linezolid in the treatment of vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium infections

Issam Raad1,*, Ray Hachem1, Hend Hanna1, Claude Afif1,§, Carmen Escalante2, Hagop Kantarjian3 and Kenneth Rolston1

Departments of 1 Infectious Diseases, Infection Control and Employee Health, 2 General Internal Medicine, and 3 Leukemia, The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Texas, USA

Received 31 July 2003; returned 21 October 2003; revised 5 January 2004; accepted 15 January 2004

Objectives: Quinupristin–dalfopristin and linezolid have been shown to be efficacious in the treatment of vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium (VREF) infections. However, the two antibiotics have not been compared in terms of safety and efficacy in a prospective randomized study. The objective of this study was to compare the safety and efficacy of the two drugs in the treatment of VREF infections in cancer patients.

Patients and methods: Forty cancer patients with VREF infection were randomized to receive linezolid 600 mg every 12 h or quinupristin–dalfopristin 7.5 mg/kg every 8 h. All patients were followed up for 30 days after discontinuation of study drugs.

Results: Linezolid and quinupristin–dalfopristin had comparable clinical responses (58% and 43%, respectively, P = 0.6). Myalgias and/or arthralgias occurred at a frequency of 33% in patients who received quinupristin–dalfopristin, but were not observed in the linezolid group (P = 0.03). In contrast, drug-related thrombocytopenia occurred in 11% of patients who received linezolid, but was not observed in the quinupristin–dalfopristin group (P = 0.2).

Conclusion: In cancer patients, quinupristin–dalfopristin treatment is associated with a relatively high frequency of myalgias/arthralgias; however, profound thrombocytopenia might limit the choice of linezolid in a subpopulation of cancer patients.

Keywords: enterococcal infections, enterococcal bacteraemia, resistant Gram-positive infections, Synercid, Zyvox

* Correspondence address. Department of Infectious Diseases, Infection Control and Employee Health (Unit 402), The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd., Houston, Texas 77030, USA. Tel: +1-713-792-7943; Fax: +1-713-792-8233; E-mail: iraad{at}mdanderson.org

§ Present address. University of Balamand Faculty of Medicine & Medical Sciences, Beirut, Lebanon


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Journal of Pharmacy PracticeHome page
C. Schriever, L. Zeitz-Colaizzi, A. Quinn, A. E. Schriever, and J. P. Cannon
Considerations for the Management of Gram-Positive Pathogens in the Intensive Care Unit
Journal of Pharmacy Practice, April 1, 2005; 18(2): 100 - 108.
[Abstract] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.