Skip Navigation


JAC Advance Access originally published online on February 18, 2004
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
53/4/604    most recent
dkh128v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (11)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Nicodemo, A. C.
Right arrow Articles by Gales, A. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Nicodemo, A. C.
Right arrow Articles by Gales, A. C.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?


Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy (2004) 53, 604-608
© 2004 The British Society for Antimicrobial Chemotherapy

In vitro susceptibility of Stenotrophomonas maltophilia isolates: comparison of disc diffusion, Etest and agar dilution methods

A. C. Nicodemo1,*, M. R. E. Araujo2, A. S. Ruiz2 and A. C. Gales3

1 Department of Infectious Diseases, University of São Paulo Medical School; 2 Hospital Sírio Libanês; 3 Division of Infectious Diseases, Federal University of São Paulo, São Paulo, S.P., Brazil

Received 21 October 2003; returned 3 December 2003; revised 24 December 2003; accepted 28 December 2003

The disc diffusion, Etest and agar dilution techniques were compared to evaluate the antimicrobial susceptibility profile of 70 Stenotrophomonas maltophilia isolates to seven antimicrobial agents. The S. maltophilia isolates were consecutively collected from May 2000 to May 2002 from individual patients, who were hospitalized in a private Brazilian hospital. The antimicrobial susceptibility tests were carried out and interpreted according to the National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards (NCCLS) recommendations. The Etest was carried out according to the manufacturer’s instructions. There was good agreement among the distinct susceptibility testing results for chloramphenicol, doxycycline, gatifloxacin, trimethoprim–sulfamethoxazole and ticarcillin–clavulanate, suggesting that the disc diffusion and Etest methods are reliable for testing this group of antimicrobials against S. maltophilia. In contrast, a weak correlation was found between the disc diffusion and agar dilution techniques for testing polymyxin B and colistin with unacceptable very major error rates (18.1% and 22.7% for polymyxin B and colistin, respectively). Trimethoprim– sulfamethoxazole (MIC50, 0.06 mg/L; 98.5% susceptible) and gatifloxacin (MIC50, 0.12 mg/L; 98.5% susceptible) were the most potent antimicrobial agents tested against S. maltophilia isolates. In contrast, the worst in vitro activity was found for ticarcillin–clavulanate (MIC50, 16 mg/L; 59.1% susceptible). Although our results confirm that trimethoprim–sulfamethoxazole, gatifloxacin and doxycycline have an excellent in vitro activity against S. maltophilia, further clinical studies are necessary to evaluate the clinical efficacy of these compounds for the treatment of S. maltophilia infections, since no randomized controlled trials have been carried out and no correlation between the clinical response and susceptibility testing results has been reported.

Keywords: susceptibility testing, drug resistance, S. maltophilia

* Corresponding author. Tel: +55-11-32144251; Fax: +55-11-32591318; E-mail: ac_nicodemo{at}uol.com.br


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Clin. Microbiol. Rev.Home page
D. Landman, C. Georgescu, D. A. Martin, and J. Quale
Polymyxins Revisited
Clin. Microbiol. Rev., July 1, 2008; 21(3): 449 - 465.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.Home page
J. R. Lo-Ten-Foe, A. M. G. A. de Smet, B. M. W. Diederen, J. A. J. W. Kluytmans, and P. H. J. van Keulen
Comparative Evaluation of the VITEK 2, Disk Diffusion, Etest, Broth Microdilution, and Agar Dilution Susceptibility Testing Methods for Colistin in Clinical Isolates, Including Heteroresistant Enterobacter cloacae and Acinetobacter baumannii Strains
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother., October 1, 2007; 51(10): 3726 - 3730.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur Respir JHome page
A. Pathmanathan and G. W. Waterer
Significance of positive Stenotrophomonas maltophilia culture in acute respiratory tract infection
Eur. Respir. J., May 1, 2005; 25(5): 911 - 914.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.