JAC Advance Access originally published online on February 12, 2004
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy (2004) 53, 441-444
© 2004 The British Society for Antimicrobial Chemotherapy
Mutant prevention concentration: comparison of fluoroquinolones and linezolid with Mycobacterium tuberculosis
1 S. Microbiology and 2 S. Pharmacy, Hospital General Universitario de Elche, Elche, 03203 Spain
Received 8 October 2003; returned 25 November 2003; revised 9 December 2003; accepted 18 December 2003
Objectives: The mutant prevention concentration (MPC) has recently been defined to characterize the capacity for severely restricting the selection of resistant mutants during antibiotic treatment. We determined this parameter for ciprofloxacin, levofloxacin, gatifloxacin, moxifloxacin and linezolid in Mycobacterium tuberculosis clinical isolates in our setting.
Methods: We determined the antibiotic concentration that prevents the selection of resistant mutants following inoculation with a high mycobacteria inoculum on Middlebrook 7H11 plates with serial dilutions of the antibiotics in 224 M. tuberculosis isolates.
Results: Fifty percent of the strains exhibited values of MPC (MPC50) lower than 0.8, 0.6, 0.4, 0.4 and 0.6 mg/L for ciprofloxacin, levofloxacin, gatifloxacin, moxifloxacin and linezolid, respectively. If 90% of the strains are considered (MPC90), the values are seen to rise to 2, 1.8, 1, 1.2 and 1.2 mg/L, respectively.
Conclusions: When we compare this parameter with the drug levels in serum and tissue, it can be seen that ciprofloxacin is the least useful of the fluoroquinolones studied, whereas moxifloxacin appears to be the most active. Linezolid exhibits excellent activity against this microorganism (MPC90 1.2 mg/L and AUC 140.3 mg·h/L) and this makes us consider that its usefulness in the treatment of this pathology should be thoroughly evaluated.
Keywords: tuberculosis, drug activity, fluoroquinolones, oxazolidinones
* Corresponding author. Tel: +34-6679493; Fax: +34-966679108; E-mail: micro_elx{at}gva.es
![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
X. Zhao and K. Drlica A unified anti-mutant dosing strategy J. Antimicrob. Chemother., September 1, 2008; 62(3): 434 - 436. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. M. Boak, J. Li, C. R. Rayner, and R. L. Nation Pharmacokinetic/Pharmacodynamic Factors Influencing Emergence of Resistance to Linezolid in an In Vitro Model Antimicrob. Agents Chemother., April 1, 2007; 51(4): 1287 - 1292. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C-Y. Chiang, D. A. Enarson, M-C. Yu, K-J. Bai, R-M. Huang, C-J. Hsu, J. Suo, and T-P. Lin Outcome of pulmonary multidrug-resistant tuberculosis: a 6-yr follow-up study Eur. Respir. J., November 1, 2006; 28(5): 980 - 985. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
I-N. Park, S.-B. Hong, Y.-M. Oh, M.-N. Kim, C.-M. Lim, S. D. Lee, Y. Koh, W. S. Kim, D. S. Kim, W. D. Kim, et al. Efficacy and tolerability of daily-half dose linezolid in patients with intractable multidrug-resistant tuberculosis J. Antimicrob. Chemother., September 1, 2006; 58(3): 701 - 704. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. Nahid, M. Pai, and P. C. Hopewell Advances in the diagnosis and treatment of tuberculosis. Proceedings of the ATS, January 1, 2006; 3(1): 103 - 110. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Fortun, P. Martin-Davila, E. Navas, M. J. Perez-Elias, J. Cobo, M. Tato, E. G.-G. De la Pedrosa, E. Gomez-Mampaso, and S. Moreno Linezolid for the treatment of multidrug-resistant tuberculosis J. Antimicrob. Chemother., July 1, 2005; 56(1): 180 - 185. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||



