Skip Navigation


JAC Advance Access originally published online on February 4, 2004
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
53/3/435    most recent
dkh114v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (10)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Oliva, B.
Right arrow Articles by Chopra, I.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Oliva, B.
Right arrow Articles by Chopra, I.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?


Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy (2004) 53, 435-440
© 2004 The British Society for Antimicrobial Chemotherapy

Anti-staphylococcal activity and mode of action of clofazimine

Brunello Oliva1, Alexander John O’Neill2, Keith Miller2, William Stubbings2 and Ian Chopra2,*

1 Department of Experimental Medicine, University of L’Aquila, Coppito-67100, L’Aquila, Italy; 2 Antimicrobial Research Centre and Division of Microbiology, School of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, University of Leeds, Leeds LS2 9JT, UK

Received 27 August 2003; returned 8 December 2003; revised 15 December 2003; accepted 16 December 2003

Objectives: Infections caused by Staphylococcus aureus might be treated with agents whose primary indications are for other infections. Clofazimine, an established anti-mycobacterial drug, could be such a candidate. However, the anti-staphylococcal properties of clofazimine have not been fully described and its mode of action, possibly involving inhibition of both RNA polymerase and a membrane-located target, has not been explored in detail. We have now conducted experiments to address these issues.

Methods: Using established procedures, we examined the activity of clofazimine against a range of clinical isolates of S. aureus and determined whether it was bactericidal, exhibited a post-antibiotic effect (PAE), or interacted synergically with other agents. The potential for emergence of clofazimine-resistant mutants was also examined. Mode of action studies involved macromolecular synthesis assays, cross-screening against rifampicin-resistant mutants, susceptibility of RNA polymerase to clofazimine in vitro and several methods to detect drug-induced membrane damage.

Results: Clofazimine demonstrated good anti-staphylococcal activity encompassing MSSA, MRSA and GISA. It was bactericidal and resistant mutants could not be isolated. Clofazimine did not exhibit a PAE and failed to act synergically with other drugs. No evidence for specific inhibition of RNA polymerase was obtained. Clofazimine caused non-specific inhibition of DNA, RNA and protein synthesis, consistent with membrane-damaging activity that was detected in three independent assays for membrane disrupting agents.

Conclusions: Clofazimine is a potent anti-staphylococcal agent. It appears to be a membrane-disrupting agent and does not inhibit RNA polymerase.

Keywords: Staphylococcus aureus, mechanisms of antibiotic action, membrane-disrupting agent

* Corresponding author. Tel: +44-113-233-5604; Fax: +44-113-233-5638; E-mail: i.chopra{at}leeds.ac.uk


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Antimicrob ChemotherHome page
M. C. Cholo, H. I. Boshoff, H. C. Steel, R. Cockeran, N. M. Matlola, K. J. Downing, V. Mizrahi, and R. Anderson
Effects of clofazimine on potassium uptake by a Trk-deletion mutant of Mycobacterium tuberculosis
J. Antimicrob. Chemother., January 1, 2006; 57(1): 79 - 84.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Antimicrob ChemotherHome page
A. J. O'Neill, K. Miller, B. Oliva, and I. Chopra
Comparison of assays for detection of agents causing membrane damage in Staphylococcus aureus
J. Antimicrob. Chemother., December 1, 2004; 54(6): 1127 - 1129.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Antimicrob ChemotherHome page
W. J. Stubbings, J. M. Bostock, E. Ingham, and I. Chopra
Assessment of a microplate method for determining the post-antibiotic effect in Staphylococcus aureus and Escherichia coli
J. Antimicrob. Chemother., July 1, 2004; 54(1): 139 - 143.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.