Skip Navigation


JAC Advance Access originally published online on December 19, 2003
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
53/2/252    most recent
dkh036v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (10)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Linde, H.-J.
Right arrow Articles by Lehn, N.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Linde, H.-J.
Right arrow Articles by Lehn, N.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?


Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy (2004) 53, 252-257
© 2004 The British Society for Antimicrobial Chemotherapy

Mutant prevention concentration of nalidixic acid, ciprofloxacin, clinafloxacin, levofloxacin, norfloxacin, ofloxacin, sparfloxacin or trovafloxacin for Escherichia coli under different growth conditions

Hans-Jörg Linde* and Norbert Lehn

Institute for Medical Microbiology and Hygiene, University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany

Received 4 August 2003; returned 25 September 2003; revised 10 October 2003; accepted 23 October 2003

Objectives: We used two different strains of Escherichia coli, E.coli ATCC 25922 and a recent urinary isolate from a clinical sample, to investigate in vitro how the MIC and mutant prevention concentration (MPC) are affected by different temperatures (37 or 20°C) or oxygen tension (aerobic or anaerobic atmosphere; MIC, MICan; MPC, MPCan).

Materials and methods: MIC and MPC for E.coli ATCC 25922 and the clinical isolate were determined on agar containing ciprofloxacin or levofloxacin, and for the ATCC strain on agar supplemented with nalidixic acid, norfloxacin, ofloxacin, sparfloxacin, trovafloxacin or clinafloxacin.

Results: Results for the ATCC strain and the clinical strain for ciprofloxacin or levofloxacin were similar. The MPC values for E.coli ATCC 25922 were 2 x MIC (trovafloxacin), 4 x MIC (ciprofloxacin, norfloxacin, ofloxacin), 8 x MIC (clinafloxacin, levofloxacin), 16 x MIC (sparfloxacin) and 32 x MIC (nalidixic acid) at 37°C and under aerobic conditions. Generally, a 37°C aerobic atmosphere was associated with the highest MPC values. As an exception, both the MIC and the MPC of ciprofloxacin were higher under anaerobic versus aerobic conditions (MICan ~ 8 x MIC; MPCan = 4 x MPC) for both E.coli isolates. Irrespective of the quinolone or growth conditions, the MIC for mutants was 1–256 x wild-type MIC. Calculated from published serum half-lives and the MPC values from this study, a putative selection period, in which resistant mutants might be selected, was calculated to be 14 h for nalidixic acid, 16 h for norfloxacin and ciprofloxacin, 28 h for ofloxacin, 30 h for trovafloxacin, 35 h for levofloxacin, 40 h for clinafloxacin, and 120 h for sparfloxacin.

Conclusions: As calculated from our model in respect to the length of the selection period, long serum half-lives of recently developed compounds could not be compensated for by a more favourable activity in terms of MPC. Higher concentrations of ciprofloxacin may be required under an anaerobic atmosphere to prevent the emergence of resistant mutants among 1010 cfu.

Keywords: MPC, quinolones, resistance

* Corresponding author. Tel: +49-941-944-6414; Fax: +49-941-944-6402; E-mail: Hans-Joerg.Linde{at}klinik.uni-regensburg.de


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
J.-B. Michel, P. J. Yeh, R. Chait, R. C. Moellering Jr., and R. Kishony
Drug interactions modulate the potential for evolution of resistance
PNAS, September 30, 2008; 105(39): 14918 - 14923.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.Home page
K. Drlica, X. Zhao, J. M. Blondeau, and C. Hesje
Low Correlation between MIC and Mutant Prevention Concentration
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother., January 1, 2006; 50(1): 403 - 404.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Antimicrob ChemotherHome page
L. L. Marcusson, S. K. Olofsson, P. K. Lindgren, O. Cars, and D. Hughes
Mutant prevention concentrations of ciprofloxacin for urinary tract infection isolates of Escherichia coli
J. Antimicrob. Chemother., June 1, 2005; 55(6): 938 - 943.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Antimicrob ChemotherHome page
L. P. Randall, S. W. Cooles, L. J. V. Piddock, and M. J. Woodward
Mutant prevention concentrations of ciprofloxacin and enrofloxacin for Salmonella enterica
J. Antimicrob. Chemother., September 1, 2004; 54(3): 688 - 691.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.