Skip Navigation


JAC Advance Access originally published online on November 25, 2003
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
53/1/58    most recent
dkh007v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (18)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Blickwede, M.
Right arrow Articles by Schwarz, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Blickwede, M.
Right arrow Articles by Schwarz, S.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?


Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy (2004) 53, 58-64
© 2004 The British Society for Antimicrobial Chemotherapy

Molecular analysis of florfenicol-resistant Escherichia coli isolates from pigs

Maren Blickwede and Stefan Schwarz*

Institut für Tierzucht, Bundesforschungsanstalt für Landwirtschaft (FAL), Höltystrasse 10, 31535 Neustadt-Mariensee, Germany

Received 29 August 2003, returned 6 September 2003; revised 23 September 2003; accepted 3 October 2003

Objectives: The aim of this study was to analyse florfenicol-resistant Escherichia coli isolates from pigs for the genetic basis of florfenicol resistance, and to compare these data with those previously determined for E. coli isolates from cattle and poultry.

Methods: Fourteen porcine E. coli isolates were included in this study and subjected to serotyping, plasmid profiling and macrorestriction analysis. MICs of florfenicol were determined by broth microdilution. The presence of the gene floR was confirmed by hybridization and PCR analysis. Transformation experiments were conducted to isolate florfenicol resistance plasmids. The floR region of a florfenicol resistance plasmid was cloned and sequenced.

Results: All florfenicol-resistant E. coli isolates exhibited MICs of florfenicol >128 mg/L and carried the floR gene. A single isolate had a floR-carrying plasmid of ~35 kb, designated pMBSF1. Sequence analysis identified the floR gene flanked by truncated transposase genes. Moreover, a truncated copy of Tn5393 with complete streptomycin resistance genes strA and strB was found upstream of the floR gene of pMBSF1. Chromosomally resistant E. coli isolates, which shared the same BlnI macrorestriction pattern, differed in their floR hybridization patterns.

Conclusion: The plasmid pMBSF1 is the smallest floR-carrying plasmid reported to date. Its floR region differed from those previously found in E. coli isolates from cattle. Variations in the RFLPs of chromosomal EcoRI fragments carrying floR in isolates that had the same macrorestriction pattern might suggest variable chromosomal integration sites.

Keywords: florfenicol resistance, floR gene, transposon Tn5393, transposon Tn1721, recombination

* Corresponding author. Tel: +49-5034-871-241; Fax: +49-5034-871-246; E-mail: stefan.schwarz{at}fal.de


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Antimicrob ChemotherHome page
C. Kehrenberg, J. Wallmann, and S. Schwarz
Molecular analysis of florfenicol-resistant Pasteurella multocida isolates in Germany
J. Antimicrob. Chemother., November 1, 2008; 62(5): 951 - 955.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.Home page
C. Revilla, M. P. Garcillan-Barcia, R. Fernandez-Lopez, N. R. Thomson, M. Sanders, M. Cheung, C. M. Thomas, and F. de la Cruz
Different Pathways to Acquiring Resistance Genes Illustrated by the Recent Evolution of IncW Plasmids
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother., April 1, 2008; 52(4): 1472 - 1480.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Antimicrob ChemotherHome page
K. Kadlec, C. Kehrenberg, and S. Schwarz
Efflux-mediated resistance to florfenicol and/or chloramphenicol in Bordetella bronchiseptica: identification of a novel chloramphenicol exporter
J. Antimicrob. Chemother., February 1, 2007; 59(2): 191 - 196.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev.Home page
M. A. Toleman, P. M. Bennett, and T. R. Walsh
ISCR Elements: Novel Gene-Capturing Systems of the 21st Century?
Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev., June 1, 2006; 70(2): 296 - 316.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.Home page
C. Kehrenberg and S. Schwarz
Distribution of Florfenicol Resistance Genes fexA and cfr among Chloramphenicol-Resistant Staphylococcus Isolates.
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother., April 1, 2006; 50(4): 1156 - 1163.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Microbiol.Home page
B. Wu, C. Xia, X. Du, X. Cao, and J. Shen
Influence of Anti-FloR Antibody on Florfenicol Accumulation in Florfenicol-Resistant Escherichia coli and Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay for Detection of Florfenicol-Resistant E. coli Isolates
J. Clin. Microbiol., February 1, 2006; 44(2): 378 - 382.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Antimicrob ChemotherHome page
K. Kadlec, C. Kehrenberg, and S. Schwarz
Molecular basis of resistance to trimethoprim, chloramphenicol and sulphonamides in Bordetella bronchiseptica
J. Antimicrob. Chemother., September 1, 2005; 56(3): 485 - 490.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.Home page
B. Doublet, S. Schwarz, C. Kehrenberg, and A. Cloeckaert
Florfenicol Resistance Gene floR Is Part of a Novel Transposon
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother., May 1, 2005; 49(5): 2106 - 2108.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Antimicrob ChemotherHome page
C. Kehrenberg and S. Schwarz
Plasmid-borne florfenicol resistance in Pasteurella multocida
J. Antimicrob. Chemother., May 1, 2005; 55(5): 773 - 775.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.