Skip Navigation


JAC Advance Access originally published online on September 30, 2003
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
52/5/820    most recent
dkg440v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (8)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Drinkovic, D.
Right arrow Articles by West, T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Drinkovic, D.
Right arrow Articles by West, T.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?


Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy (2003) 52, 820-825
© 2003 The British Society for Antimicrobial Chemotherapy

Bacteriological outcome of combination versus single-agent treatment for staphylococcal endocarditis

Dragana Drinkovic1, Arthur J. Morris1,*, Sudha Pottumarthy1, Donald MacCulloch1 and Teena West2

Departments of 1 Microbiology and 2 Biostatistics, Green Lane Hospital, Auckland, New Zealand

Received 10 June 2003; returned 12 July 2003; revised 23 July 2003; accepted 11 August 2003

Objective: To analyse the bacteriological outcome of combination versus single-agent antimicrobial treatment in staphylococcal endocarditis.

Patients and methods: Retrospective review of 152 episodes: 91 cases of native valve endocarditis (NVE), 74 due to Staphylococcus aureus and 17 due to coagulase-negative staphylococci (CoNS); and 61 cases of prosthetic valve endocarditis (PVE), 29 due to S. aureus and 32 due to CoNS.

Results: Valves from patients with S. aureus NVE treated with any kind of combination antibiotic treatment were no more likely to be culture-negative than those treated with a single agent [19 (45%) of 42 versus 13 (41%) of 32; P = 0.69]. This finding remained unchanged when cases of CoNS NVE were added to the S. aureus group. In PVE, after adjusting for duration of treatment, valves from patients receiving any kind of combination treatment were 5.9 times (95% confidence interval 1.3–27.5) more likely to be culture-negative than those receiving monotherapy (P = 0.024). Patients treated for >14 days were more likely to be culture-negative than those treated for <=14 days [49 (83%) of 59 versus 29 (31%) of 93; P < 0.001].

Conclusions: In staphylococcal NVE, combination treatment is not superior to monotherapy in sterilizing infected valves, but in PVE combination treatment confers an advantage.

Keywords: coagulase-negative staphylococci, culture result, heart valves, Staphylococcus aureus, Staphylococcus epidermidis

* Correspondence address. Microbiology Laboratory, Auckland City Hospital, PO Box 110031, Auckland 1003, New Zealand. Tel: +649-571-4093; Fax: +649-571-4091; E-mail: amorris{at}dml.co.nz


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Antimicrob ChemotherHome page
A. Upton, D. Drinkovic, S. Pottumarthy, T. West, and A. J. Morris
Culture results of heart valves resected because of streptococcal endocarditis: insights into duration of treatment to achieve valve sterilization
J. Antimicrob. Chemother., February 1, 2005; 55(2): 234 - 239.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.