Skip Navigation


JAC Advance Access originally published online on September 12, 2003
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
52/4/663    most recent
dkg419v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (12)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Linder, N.
Right arrow Articles by Sirota, L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Linder, N.
Right arrow Articles by Sirota, L.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?


Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy (2003) 52, 663-667
© 2003 The British Society for Antimicrobial Chemotherapy

Treatment of candidaemia in premature infants: comparison of three amphotericin B preparations

Nehama Linder1,2,*, Gil Klinger1,2, Itamar Shalit2,3, Itzhak Levy2,3, Shai Ashkenazi2,3, Gali Haski4, Orli Levit1,2 and Lea Sirota1,2

1 Department of Neonatology, 3 Infectious Disease Unit and 4 Pharmacy, Schneider Children’s Medical Center of Israel, Petah Tikva, Israel; 2 Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel

Received 6 April 2003; returned 29 June 2003; revised 14 July 2003;; accepted 16 July 2003

Objective: The objective of this study was to compare the effectiveness and tolerability of three antifungal preparations, amphotericin B, liposomal amphotericin B (LamB) and amphotericin B colloidal dispersion (ABCD), in the treatment of neonatal Candida bloodstream infection (CBSI).

Patients and methods: All patients hospitalized in the neonatal intensive care unit from 1996 to 2000 with CBSI were enrolled. Patients with a serum creatinine concentration of <1.2 mg/dL received amphotericin B, and those with serum creatinine >=1.2 mg/dL received LamB or ABCD. Complete blood counts, and renal and hepatic function tests were obtained before, during and after treatment; blood cultures were performed daily until three consecutive cultures were negative. If cultures were positive for more than 10 days with clinical signs of fungal infection and/or persistent thrombocytopenia, a second antifungal drug was added.

Results: Fifty-six infants met the study criteria: four term and 52 preterm, including 36 extremely low birth weight infants. Amphotericin B was the initial treatment for 34, LamB for 6 and ABCD for 16 infants. No differences in mortality were found between the three groups. Sterilization of the blood was achieved with amphotericin B in 67.6% of patients, LamB in 83.3% and ABCD in 57.1%, when used as monotherapy; with the addition of a second antifungal agent, success rates were 100%, 83.3% and 92.8%, respectively. There were no differences between the groups in the time to resolution of fungaemia. No patients had immediate local or systemic adverse events and none showed deterioration in renal function.

Conclusion: ABCD and LamB appear to be effective, safe and well tolerated in premature infants with CBSI and renal dysfunction. Larger trials are needed before routine use can be recommended.

Keywords: liposomal amphotericin B, amphotericin B colloidal dispersion, Candida, premature infants

* Corresponding author. Tel: +972-3-9253753; Fax: +972-2-5340934; E-mail: linderm{at}netvision.net.il


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
PediatricsHome page
C. C. Blyth, P. Palasanthiran, and T. A. O'Brien
Antifungal Therapy in Children With Invasive Fungal Infections: A Systematic Review
Pediatrics, April 1, 2007; 119(4): 772 - 784.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.