JAC Advance Access originally published online on September 12, 2003
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy (2003) 52, 591-597
© 2003 The British Society for Antimicrobial Chemotherapy
Evaluation of Oxoid combination discs for detection of extended-spectrum ß-lactamases
1 Department of Microbiology, Catholic University of Louvain, Mont-Godinne University Hospital, Yvoir; 2 Department of Microbiology, Saint-Luc University Hospital, Brussels, Belgium
Received 5 May 2003; returned 5 June 2003; revised 10 July 2003; accepted 15 July 2003
Objectives: We evaluated the reliability of cefpirome/clavulanate (CD04) compared with ceftazidime/clavulanate (CD02) and cefotaxime/clavulanate (CD03) Oxoid combination discs for the detection of extended-spectrum ß-lactamases (ESBL) in several Enterobacteriaceae isolates, including Enterobacter spp.
Methods: Overall, a total of 105 ESBL-positive [positive double-disc synergy test (DDST)] and 94 ESBL-negative (negative DDST) Gram-negative isolates were evaluated. Ninety-eight isolates were confirmed as ESBL-positive on the basis of the sequence alignments of the blaTEM and/or blaSHV gene amplification products, which matched with previously identified ESBLs. The phenotypic detection of ESBLs was performed by the three combination discs according to the NCCLS and BSAC methods. The CD04 disc was evaluated with the manufacturers recommended zone size difference breakpoint of
4 mm.
Results: In Escherichia coli and Klebsiella spp., the sensitivities (%)/specificities (%) of CD02, CD03 and CD04 discs, and the combination of CD02 or CD04 discs, were, respectively, 88/92, 90/92, 95/84 and 100/82, while the corresponding figures were 94/100, 4/100, 94/100 and 100/100 in Enterobacter aerogenes. NCCLS and BSAC methods yielded concordant results in 99% of the isolates.
Conclusions: CD04 and CD02 discs were the best combination for detection of ESBLs in our collection of Enterobacteriaceae isolates, including E. aerogenes.
Keywords: Enterobacter aerogenes, ESBL detection, PCR sequencing, TEM, SHV
* Corresponding author. Tel: +32-81-42-32-00; Fax: +32-81-42-32-04; E-mail: yves.degheldre{at}mont.ucl.ac.be
![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
A. Upton, J. Mohiuddin, T. Bathgate, S. Taylor, G. Simmons, R. Woodhouse, and H. Heffernan High prevalence of CTX-M-15 extended-spectrum {beta}-lactamase among contacts of patients with shigellosis due to Shigella flexneri carrying CTX-M-15 J. Antimicrob. Chemother., October 1, 2007; 60(4): 906 - 908. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T.-E. Kim, Y.-W. Jeong, S.-H. Cho, S.-J. Kim, and H.-J. Kwon Chronological Study of Antibiotic Resistances and Their Relevant Genes in Korean Avian Pathogenic Escherichia coli Isolates J. Clin. Microbiol., October 1, 2007; 45(10): 3309 - 3315. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
I. Wiegand, H. K. Geiss, D. Mack, E. Sturenburg, and H. Seifert Detection of Extended-Spectrum Beta-Lactamases among Enterobacteriaceae by Use of Semiautomated Microbiology Systems and Manual Detection Procedures J. Clin. Microbiol., April 1, 2007; 45(4): 1167 - 1174. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y. Glupczynski, C. Berhin, C. Bauraing, and P. Bogaerts Evaluation of a New Selective Chromogenic Agar Medium for Detection of Extended-Spectrum {beta}-Lactamase-Producing Enterobacteriaceae J. Clin. Microbiol., February 1, 2007; 45(2): 501 - 505. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Spanu, M. Sanguinetti, M. Tumbarello, T. D'Inzeo, B. Fiori, B. Posteraro, R. Santangelo, R. Cauda, and G. Fadda Evaluation of the New VITEK 2 Extended-Spectrum Beta-Lactamase (ESBL) Test for Rapid Detection of ESBL Production in Enterobacteriaceae Isolates. J. Clin. Microbiol., September 1, 2006; 44(9): 3257 - 3262. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. Sturenburg, I. Sobottka, D. Noor, R. Laufs, and D. Mack Evaluation of a new cefepime-clavulanate ESBL Etest to detect extended-spectrum {beta}-lactamases in an Enterobacteriaceae strain collection J. Antimicrob. Chemother., July 1, 2004; 54(1): 134 - 138. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||

