JAC Advance Access originally published online on May 29, 2003
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy (2003) 52, 83-88
© 2003 The British Society for Antimicrobial Chemotherapy
Pharmacodynamic activity of azithromycin against macrolide-susceptible and -resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae simulating clinically achievable free serum, epithelial lining fluid and middle ear fluid concentrations
1 Department of Medical Microbiology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba; Departments of 2 Clinical Microbiology and 3 Medicine, Health Sciences Centre, MS673-820 Sherbrook Street, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada R3A 1R9
Received 19 December 2002; returned 6 March 2003; revised 2 April 2003; accepted 6 April 2003
Background: The association between macrolide resistance mechanisms and bacteriological eradication of Streptococcus pneumoniae remains poorly studied. The present study, using an in vitro pharmacodynamic model, assessed azithromycin activity against macrolide-susceptible and -resistant S. pneumoniae simulating clinically achievable free serum (S), epithelial lining fluid (ELF) and middle ear fluid (MEF) concentrations.
Materials and methods: Two macrolide-susceptible [PCR-negative for both mef(A) and erm(B)] and six macrolide-resistant [five mef(A)-positive/erm(B)-negative displaying various degrees of macrolide resistance and one mef(A)-negative/erm(B)-positive] S. pneumoniae were tested. Azithromycin was modelled simulating a dosage of 500 mg/250 mg by mouth, once a day [free S: maximum concentration (Cmax) 0.2 mg/L, t1/2 68 h; free ELF Cmax 1.0 mg/L, t1/2 68 h] and 10 mg/kg by mouth, once a day (free MEF: Cmax 1.0 mg/L, t1/2 68 h) using a one compartment model. Starting inocula were 1 x 106 cfu/mL in MuellerHinton broth with 2% lysed horse blood. Sampling at 0, 2, 4, 6, 12, 24 and 48 h assessed the extent of bacterial killing (decrease in log10 cfu/mL versus initial inoculum).
Results: Free azithromycin concentrations in serum, ELF and MEF simulating time above the MIC (T > MIC) of 100% [area under the curve to MIC (AUC024/MIC] ≥ 36.7] were bactericidal (≥3 log10 killing) at 24 and 48 h versus macrolide-susceptible S. pneumoniae. Against macrolide-resistant S. pneumoniae, free serum concentrations providing T > MIC of 0% or AUC024/MIC ≤ 1.1 demonstrated no bacterial inhibition followed by regrowth at 24 and 48 h, whereas free ELF and MEF providing T > MIC of 0% or AUC024/MIC of 4.6 produced a bacteriostatic (0.20.5 log10 killing at 24 h) effect with a mef(A) strain with an azithromycin MIC of 2 mg/L. Against mef(A)-positive S. pneumoniae strains with azithromycin MICs ≥ 4 mg/L, no bacterial killing occurred at any time point and rapid regrowth was observed simulating ELF or MEF T > MIC of 0% or AUC024/MIC ≤ 2.3.
Conclusion: Azithromycin serum, ELF and MEF concentrations rapidly eradicated macrolide-susceptible S. pneumoniae but did not eradicate macrolide-resistant S. pneumoniae regardless of resistance phenotype.
Keywords: azithromycin, pharmacodynamics, Streptococcus pneumoniae
* Corresponding author. Tel: +1-204-787-4902; Fax: +1-204-787-4699; E-mail: ggzhanel{at}pcs.mb.ca
![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
D. J. Farrell, T. M. File, and S. G. Jenkins Prevalence and Antibacterial Susceptibility of mef(A)-Positive Macrolide-Resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae over 4 Years (2000 to 2004) of the PROTEKT US Study J. Clin. Microbiol., February 1, 2007; 45(2): 290 - 293. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. A. DeRyke, X. Du, and D. P. Nicolau Evaluation of bacterial kill when modelling the bronchopulmonary pharmacokinetic profile of moxifloxacin and levofloxacin against parC-containing isolates of Streptococcus pneumoniae J. Antimicrob. Chemother., September 1, 2006; 58(3): 601 - 609. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. Sevillano, L. Alou, L. Aguilar, O. Echevarria, M.-J. Gimenez, and J. Prieto Azithromycin iv pharmacodynamic parameters predicting Streptococcus pneumoniae killing in epithelial lining fluid versus serum: an in vitro pharmacodynamic simulation J. Antimicrob. Chemother., June 1, 2006; 57(6): 1128 - 1133. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. G. Zhanel, C. Johanson, N. Laing, T. Hisanaga, A. Wierzbowski, and D. J. Hoban Pharmacodynamic Activity of Telithromycin at Simulated Clinically Achievable Free-Drug Concentrations in Serum and Epithelial Lining Fluid against Efflux (mefE)-Producing Macrolide- Resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae for Which Telithromycin MICs Vary Antimicrob. Agents Chemother., May 1, 2005; 49(5): 1943 - 1948. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. G. Zhanel, C. Johanson, T. Hisanaga, C. Mendoza, N. Laing, A. Noreddin, A. Wierzbowski, and D. J. Hoban Pharmacodynamic activity of telithromycin against macrolide-susceptible and macrolide-resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae simulating clinically achievable free serum and epithelial lining fluid concentrations J. Antimicrob. Chemother., December 1, 2004; 54(6): 1072 - 1077. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. R. Reinert Clinical efficacy of ketolides in the treatment of respiratory tract infections J. Antimicrob. Chemother., June 1, 2004; 53(6): 918 - 927. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||


