Skip Navigation


JAC Advance Access originally published online on June 12, 2003
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
52/1/11    most recent
dkg269v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (73)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Drlica, K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Drlica, K.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?


Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy (2003) 52, 11-17
© 2003 The British Society for Antimicrobial Chemotherapy


Review Article

The mutant selection window and antimicrobial resistance

Karl Drlica*

Public Health Research Institute, 225 Warren Street, Newark, NJ 07103, USA

The mutant selection window is an antimicrobial concentration range extending from the minimal concentration required to block the growth of wild-type bacteria up to that required to inhibit the growth of the least susceptible, single-step mutant. The upper boundary is also called the mutant prevention concentration (MPC). Placing antimicrobial concentrations inside the window is expected to enrich resistant mutant subpopulations selectively, whereas placing concentrations above the window is expected to restrict selective enrichment. Since window dimensions are characteristic of each pathogen–antimicrobial combination, they can be linked with antimicrobial pharmacokinetics to rank compounds and dosing regimens in terms of their propensity to enrich mutant fractions of bacterial populations. For situations in which antimicrobial concentrations cannot be kept above the window, restricting the enrichment of mutants requires combination therapy.

Keywords: mutant selection window, antimicrobial resistance

* Tel: +1-973-854-3360; Fax: +1-973-854-3101; E-mail: drlica@phri.org


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
J.-B. Michel, P. J. Yeh, R. Chait, R. C. Moellering Jr., and R. Kishony
Drug interactions modulate the potential for evolution of resistance
PNAS, September 30, 2008; 105(39): 14918 - 14923.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
M. Hegreness, N. Shoresh, D. Damian, D. Hartl, and R. Kishony
Accelerated evolution of resistance in multidrug environments
PNAS, September 16, 2008; 105(37): 13977 - 13981.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Antimicrob ChemotherHome page
X. Zhao and K. Drlica
A unified anti-mutant dosing strategy
J. Antimicrob. Chemother., September 1, 2008; 62(3): 434 - 436.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.Home page
G. T. Robertson, E. J. Bonventre, T. B. Doyle, Q. Du, L. Duncan, T. W. Morris, E. D. Roche, D. Yan, and A. S. Lynch
In Vitro Evaluation of CBR-2092, a Novel Rifamycin-Quinolone Hybrid Antibiotic: Microbiology Profiling Studies with Staphylococci and Streptococci
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother., July 1, 2008; 52(7): 2324 - 2334.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.Home page
T. Gumbo, A. Louie, M. R. Deziel, W. Liu, L. M. Parsons, M. Salfinger, and G. L. Drusano
Concentration-Dependent Mycobacterium tuberculosis Killing and Prevention of Resistance by Rifampin
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother., November 1, 2007; 51(11): 3781 - 3788.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.Home page
L. E. T. Stearne, W. H. F. Goessens, J. W. Mouton, and I. C. Gyssens
Effect of Dosing and Dosing Frequency on the Efficacy of Ceftizoxime and the Emergence of Ceftizoxime Resistance during the Early Development of Murine Abscesses Caused by Bacteroides fragilis and Enterobacter cloacae Mixed Infection
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother., October 1, 2007; 51(10): 3605 - 3611.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.Home page
B. Henrichfreise, I. Wiegand, I. Luhmer-Becker, and B. Wiedemann
Development of Resistance in Wild-Type and Hypermutable Pseudomonas aeruginosa Strains Exposed to Clinical Pharmacokinetic Profiles of Meropenem and Ceftazidime Simulated In Vitro
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother., October 1, 2007; 51(10): 3642 - 3649.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.Home page
J. M. Rodriguez-Martinez, C. Velasco, I. Garcia, M. E. Cano, L. Martinez-Martinez, and A. Pascual
Mutant Prevention Concentrations of Fluoroquinolones for Enterobacteriaceae Expressing the Plasmid-Carried Quinolone Resistance Determinant qnrA1
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother., June 1, 2007; 51(6): 2236 - 2239.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Antimicrob ChemotherHome page
C. Kehrenberg, A. de Jong, S. Friederichs, A. Cloeckaert, and S. Schwarz
Molecular mechanisms of decreased susceptibility to fluoroquinolones in avian Salmonella serovars and their mutants selected during the determination of mutant prevention concentrations
J. Antimicrob. Chemother., May 1, 2007; 59(5): 886 - 892.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.Home page
L. M. Boak, J. Li, C. R. Rayner, and R. L. Nation
Pharmacokinetic/Pharmacodynamic Factors Influencing Emergence of Resistance to Linezolid in an In Vitro Model
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother., April 1, 2007; 51(4): 1287 - 1292.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Antimicrob ChemotherHome page
W. H. F. Goessens, J. W. Mouton, M. T. ten Kate, A. J. Bijl, A. Ott, and I. A. J. M. Bakker-Woudenberg
Role of ceftazidime dose regimen on the selection of resistant Enterobacter cloacae in the intestinal flora of rats treated for an experimental pulmonary infection
J. Antimicrob. Chemother., March 1, 2007; 59(3): 507 - 516.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.Home page
D. E. Rozen, L. McGee, B. R. Levin, and K. P. Klugman
Fitness Costs of Fluoroquinolone Resistance in Streptococcus pneumoniae
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother., February 1, 2007; 51(2): 412 - 416.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.Home page
L. P. Randall, S. W. Cooles, N. C. Coldham, K. S. Stapleton, L. J. V. Piddock, and M. J. Woodward
Modification of Enrofloxacin Treatment Regimens for Poultry Experimentally Infected with Salmonella enterica Serovar Typhimurium DT104 To Minimize Selection of Resistance
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother., December 1, 2006; 50(12): 4030 - 4037.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.Home page
S. S. Bhagwat, L. A. Mundkur, S. V. Gupte, M. V. Patel, and H. F. Khorakiwala
The Anti-Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Quinolone WCK 771 Has Potent Activity against Sequentially Selected Mutants, Has a Narrow Mutant Selection Window against Quinolone-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus, and Preferentially Targets DNA Gyrase
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother., November 1, 2006; 50(11): 3568 - 3579.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.Home page
L. Pumbwe, D. Glass, and H. M. Wexler
Efflux Pump Overexpression in Multiple-Antibiotic-Resistant Mutants of Bacteroides fragilis.
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother., September 1, 2006; 50(9): 3150 - 3153.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.Home page
G. G. Zhanel, M. Mayer, N. Laing, and H. J. Adam
Mutant Prevention Concentrations of Levofloxacin Alone and in Combination with Azithromycin, Ceftazidime, Colistin (Polymyxin E), Meropenem, Piperacillin-Tazobactam, and Tobramycin against Pseudomonas aeruginosa.
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother., June 1, 2006; 50(6): 2228 - 2230.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Antimicrob ChemotherHome page
S. K. Olofsson, L. L. Marcusson, P. Komp Lindgren, D. Hughes, and O. Cars
Selection of ciprofloxacin resistance in Escherichia coli in an in vitro kinetic model: relation between drug exposure and mutant prevention concentration
J. Antimicrob. Chemother., June 1, 2006; 57(6): 1116 - 1121.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arch OphthalmolHome page
D. Miller, P. M. Flynn, I. U. Scott, E. C. Alfonso, and H. W. Flynn Jr
In vitro fluoroquinolone resistance in staphylococcal endophthalmitis isolates.
Arch Ophthalmol, April 1, 2006; 124(4): 479 - 483.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.Home page
M. D. Macia, N. Borrell, M. Segura, C. Gomez, J. L. Perez, and A. Oliver
Efficacy and Potential for Resistance Selection of Antipseudomonal Treatments in a Mouse Model of Lung Infection by Hypermutable Pseudomonas aeruginosa
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother., March 1, 2006; 50(3): 975 - 983.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.Home page
H.-G. Wetzstein
Comparative Mutant Prevention Concentrations of Pradofloxacin and Other Veterinary Fluoroquinolones Indicate Differing Potentials in Preventing Selection of Resistance
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother., October 1, 2005; 49(10): 4166 - 4173.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.Home page
K. M. Galbraith, A. C. Ng, B. J. Eggers, C. R. Kuchel, C. H. Eggers, and D. S. Samuels
parC Mutations in Fluoroquinolone-Resistant Borrelia burgdorferi
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother., October 1, 2005; 49(10): 4354 - 4357.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Antimicrob ChemotherHome page
L. L. Marcusson, S. K. Olofsson, P. K. Lindgren, O. Cars, and D. Hughes
Mutant prevention concentrations of ciprofloxacin for urinary tract infection isolates of Escherichia coli
J. Antimicrob. Chemother., June 1, 2005; 55(6): 938 - 943.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Antimicrob ChemotherHome page
J. W. Mouton, M. N. Dudley, O. Cars, H. Derendorf, and G. L. Drusano
Standardization of pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) terminology for anti-infective drugs: an update
J. Antimicrob. Chemother., May 1, 2005; 55(5): 601 - 607.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.Home page
E. D. Hermsen, L. B. Hovde, G. N. Konstantinides, and J. C. Rotschafer
Mutant Prevention Concentrations of ABT-492, Levofloxacin, Moxifloxacin, and Gatifloxacin against Three Common Respiratory Pathogens
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother., April 1, 2005; 49(4): 1633 - 1635.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.Home page
Y. Q. Liu, Y. Z. Zhang, and P. J. Gao
Novel Concentration-Killing Curve Method for Estimation of Bactericidal Potency of Antibiotics in an In Vitro Dynamic Model
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother., October 1, 2004; 48(10): 3884 - 3891.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
The Annals of PharmacotherapyHome page
B. J Epstein, J. G Gums, and K. Drlica
The Changing Face of Antibiotic Prescribing: The Mutant Selection Window
Ann. Pharmacother., October 1, 2004; 38(10): 1675 - 1682.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Antimicrob ChemotherHome page
L. P. Randall, S. W. Cooles, L. J. V. Piddock, and M. J. Woodward
Mutant prevention concentrations of ciprofloxacin and enrofloxacin for Salmonella enterica
J. Antimicrob. Chemother., September 1, 2004; 54(3): 688 - 691.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Antimicrob ChemotherHome page
D. Croisier, M. Etienne, L. Piroth, E. Bergoin, C. Lequeu, H. Portier, and P. Chavanet
In vivo pharmacodynamic efficacy of gatifloxacin against Streptococcus pneumoniae in an experimental model of pneumonia: impact of the low levels of fluoroquinolone resistance on the enrichment of resistant mutants
J. Antimicrob. Chemother., September 1, 2004; 54(3): 640 - 647.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Antimicrob ChemotherHome page
T. Lu, X. Zhao, X. Li, G. Hansen, J. Blondeau, and K. Drlica
Effect of chloramphenicol, erythromycin, moxifloxacin, penicillin and tetracycline concentration on the recovery of resistant mutants of Mycobacterium smegmatis and Staphylococcus aureus
J. Antimicrob. Chemother., July 1, 2003; 52(1): 61 - 64.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.