Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by MacGowan, A. P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by MacGowan, A. P.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?


Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy (2003) 51, ii17-ii25
© 2003 The British Society for Antimicrobial Chemotherapy


Supplement

Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic profile of linezolid in healthy volunteers and patients with Gram-positive infections

Alasdair P. MacGowan*

Bristol Centre for Antimicrobial Research and Evaluation, University of Bristol and North Bristol NHS Trust, Department of Medical Microbiology, Southmead Hospital, Westbury-on-Trym, Bristol BS10 5NB, UK

Abstract

The pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of linezolid have been extensively investigated in laboratory models, healthy volunteers and patients. Three formulations exist: an intravenous (iv) form, film-coated tablets and an oral suspension. Linezolid can be assayed in serum and body fluids by HPLC and has good bioavailability with a Cmax at 0.5–2 h. The protein binding is 31%, and the volume of distribution is 30–50 L with adequate to good tissue penetration into skin blister fluids, bone, muscle, fat, alveolar cells, lung extracellular lining fluid and CSF. There are two major metabolites of linezolid (PNU-142586 and PNU-142300). Non-enzymic formation of PNU-142586 is the rate-limiting step in the clearance of linezolid, and linezolid and its two main metabolites plus several minor ones are all excreted in the urine. Dose linearity is evident in the Cmax and AUC across a wide range of doses. Gender and age have little effect on pharmacokinetics, but children have greater plasma clearance and volume of distribution and hence, have lower serum concentrations for equivalent doses in adults. No dose modification is needed in mild to moderate liver disease or any degree of renal impairment; however, both PNU-142586 and PNU-142300 accumulate in renal failure. Linezolid is bacteriostatic with a significant post-antibiotic effect against the key pathogens. In animal models of infection, the time the antibiotic concentration exceeds the MIC (t > MIC) helps to determine outcome, and a t > MIC of 40% is predictive of a bacteriostatic effect for both staphylococci and pneumococci. In man, t > MIC and AUC/MIC have been related to bacteriological and clinical outcomes. AUC and length of treatment are also related to the risk of thrombocytopenia.

Footnotes

* Tel: +44-117-959-5652; Fax: +44-117-959-3154; E-mail: alasdair.macgowan{at}north-bristol.swest.nhs.uk


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.Home page
J. J. Hilliard, J. Fernandez, J. Melton, M. J. Macielag, R. Goldschmidt, K. Bush, and D. Abbanat
In Vivo Activity of the Pyrrolopyrazolyl-Substituted Oxazolidinone RWJ-416457
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother., May 1, 2009; 53(5): 2028 - 2033.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Antimicrob ChemotherHome page
F. Pea, P. Viale, M. Lugano, U. Baccarani, F. Pavan, M. Tavio, G. L. Adani, G. Della Rocca, and M. Furlanut
Biliary penetration and pharmacodynamic exposure of linezolid in liver transplant patients
J. Antimicrob. Chemother., January 1, 2009; 63(1): 167 - 169.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Clin PharmacolHome page
S. Schmidt, R. Banks, V. Kumar, K. H. Rand, and H. Derendorf
Clinical Microdialysis in Skin and Soft Tissues: An Update
J. Clin. Pharmacol., March 1, 2008; 48(3): 351 - 364.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Antimicrob ChemotherHome page
G. Steinkraus, R. White, and L. Friedrich
Vancomycin MIC creep in non-vancomycin-intermediate Staphylococcus aureus (VISA), vancomycin-susceptible clinical methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) blood isolates from 2001 05
J. Antimicrob. Chemother., October 1, 2007; 60(4): 788 - 794.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Antimicrob ChemotherHome page
G. E. Stein, S. Schooley, C. A. Peloquin, A. Missavage, and D. H. Havlichek
Linezolid tissue penetration and serum activity against strains of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus with reduced vancomycin susceptibility in diabetic patients with foot infections
J. Antimicrob. Chemother., October 1, 2007; 60(4): 819 - 823.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.Home page
A. Soriano, M. Ortega, S. Garcia, G. Penarroja, A. Bove, M. Marcos, J. C. Martinez, J. A. Martinez, and J. Mensa
Comparative Study of the Effects of Pyridoxine, Rifampin, and Renal Function on Hematological Adverse Events Induced by Linezolid
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother., July 1, 2007; 51(7): 2559 - 2563.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.Home page
P. Myrianthefs, S. L. Markantonis, K. Vlachos, M. Anagnostaki, E. Boutzouka, D. Panidis, and G. Baltopoulos
Serum and Cerebrospinal Fluid Concentrations of Linezolid in Neurosurgical Patients
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother., December 1, 2006; 50(12): 3971 - 3976.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br J OphthalmolHome page
J I Prydal, D R Jenkins, A Lovering, and A Watts
The pharmacokinetics of linezolid in the non-inflamed human eye
Br J Ophthalmol, November 1, 2005; 89(11): 1418 - 1419.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.Home page
P. Beringer, M. Nguyen, N. Hoem, S. Louie, M. Gill, M. Gurevitch, and A. Wong-Beringer
Absolute Bioavailability and Pharmacokinetics of Linezolid in Hospitalized Patients Given Enteral Feedings
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother., September 1, 2005; 49(9): 3676 - 3681.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Pharmacy PracticeHome page
C. Schriever, L. Zeitz-Colaizzi, A. Quinn, A. E. Schriever, and J. P. Cannon
Considerations for the Management of Gram-Positive Pathogens in the Intensive Care Unit
Journal of Pharmacy Practice, April 1, 2005; 18(2): 100 - 108.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
J Antimicrob ChemotherHome page
T. Whitehouse, J. A. Cepeda, R. Shulman, L. Aarons, R. Nalda-Molina, C. Tobin, A. MacGowan, S. Shaw, C. Kibbler, M. Singer, et al.
Pharmacokinetic studies of linezolid and teicoplanin in the critically ill
J. Antimicrob. Chemother., March 1, 2005; 55(3): 333 - 340.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.Home page
J. E. Conte Jr., J. A. Golden, J. Kipps, M. McIver, and E. Zurlinden
Intrapulmonary Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of Itraconazole and 14-Hydroxyitraconazole at Steady State
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother., October 1, 2004; 48(10): 3823 - 3827.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.