Skip Navigation


JAC Advance Access originally published online on December 12, 2002
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
51/1/147    most recent
dkg049v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (8)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Pérez-Vázquez, M.
Right arrow Articles by Campos, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Pérez-Vázquez, M.
Right arrow Articles by Campos, J.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?


Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy (2003) 51, 147-151
© 2003 The British Society for Antimicrobial Chemotherapy

Activities of 13 quinolones by three susceptibility testing methods against a collection of Haemophilus influenzae isolates with different levels of susceptibility to ciprofloxacin: evidence for cross-resistance

María Pérez-Vázquez1, Federico Román1, M. Carmen Varela2, Rafael Cantón2 and José Campos1,*

1 Centro Nacional de Microbiología, Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Carretera Majadahonda a Pozuelo, Km. 2, 28220 Majadahonda, Madrid; 2 Servicio de Microbiología, Hospital Ramón y Cajal, Madrid, Spain

Received 21 May 2002; returned 8 August 2002; revised 19 September 2002; accepted 19 October 2002

The activities of nalidixic acid, ciprofloxacin, norfloxacin, ofloxacin, pefloxacin, flerofloxacin, sparfloxacin, grepafloxacin, gatifloxacin, moxifloxacin, trovafloxacin, levofloxacin and clinafloxacin against a panel of Haemophilus influenzae strains were assessed by three susceptibility testing methods: Etest, agar dilution and the reference broth microdilution method using Haemophilus test medium (HTM) in all cases. The panel included 62 clinical and two reference H. influenzae strains; 32 had decreased susceptibility to ciprofloxacin (MIC >= 0.12 mg/L) and 30 were susceptible to this antibiotic (MIC <= 0.06 mg/L). Both Etest and HTM agar dilution results (r = 0.96; 86.61% and 82.1% of MICs within + one log2, respectively) correlated well with the reference microdilution method. The MIC90 of ciprofloxacin was 4.0 mg/L (range 0.007–32.0 mg/L). Trovafloxacin activity was similar to that of ciprofloxacin but sparfloxacin, grepafloxacin, ofloxacin, pefloxacin and flerofloxacin activities were higher (with MIC values one log2 dilution lower than ciprofloxacin). The least active were norfloxacin (MIC90 16 mg/L) and nalidixic acid (MIC90 128 mg/L). Levofloxacin and moxifloxacin were more active than ciprofloxacin (MIC90 2 mg/L); clinafloxacin and gatifloxacin were the most active with an MIC90 of 0.25 mg/L. Cross-susceptibility among all quinolones was observed (r > 0.9). Resistance to ciprofloxacin was associated with a similar magnitude of activity loss to other new and old quinolones. Ciprofloxacin MIC determination should be sufficient to detect the decreased susceptibility to the whole group of quinolones.

Keywords: Haemophilus influenzae, antibiotic resistance, quinolones, susceptibility testing methods

* Corresponding author. Tel: +34-91-509-7901, ext. 3650, 3643; Fax: +34-91-509-7966; E-mail: jcampos{at}isciii.es


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Clin. Microbiol.Home page
S. Nakamura, K. Yanagihara, Y. Morinaga, K. Izumikawa, M. Seki, H. Kakeya, Y. Yamamoto, S. Kamihira, and S. Kohno
Melting Curve Analysis for Rapid Detection of Topoisomerase Gene Mutations in Haemophilus influenzae
J. Clin. Microbiol., March 1, 2009; 47(3): 781 - 784.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.Home page
M. Perez-Vazquez, F. Roman, S. Garcia-Cobos, and J. Campos
Fluoroquinolone Resistance in Haemophilus influenzae Is Associated with Hypermutability
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother., April 1, 2007; 51(4): 1566 - 1569.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.Home page
X. Li, N. Mariano, J. J. Rahal, C. M. Urban, and K. Drlica
Quinolone-Resistant Haemophilus influenzae: Determination of Mutant Selection Window for Ciprofloxacin, Garenoxacin, Levofloxacin, and Moxifloxacin
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother., November 1, 2004; 48(11): 4460 - 4462.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Microbiol.Home page
F. Roman, R. Canton, M. Perez-Vazquez, F. Baquero, and J. Campos
Dynamics of Long-Term Colonization of Respiratory Tract by Haemophilus influenzae in Cystic Fibrosis Patients Shows a Marked Increase in Hypermutable Strains
J. Clin. Microbiol., April 1, 2004; 42(4): 1450 - 1459.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Microbiol.Home page
M. Perez-Vazquez, F. Roman, B. Aracil, R. Canton, and J. Campos
Laboratory Detection of Haemophilus influenzae with Decreased Susceptibility to Nalidixic Acid, Ciprofloxacin, Levofloxacin, and Moxifloxacin Due to gyrA and parC Mutations
J. Clin. Microbiol., March 1, 2004; 42(3): 1185 - 1191.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.Home page
M. Perez-Vazquez, F. Roman, B. Aracil, R. Canton, and J. Campos
In Vitro Activities of Garenoxacin (BMS-284756) against Haemophilus influenzae Isolates with Different Fluoroquinolone Susceptibilities
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother., November 1, 2003; 47(11): 3539 - 3541.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.