Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Farrell, D. J.
Right arrow Articles by Felmingham, D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Farrell, D. J.
Right arrow Articles by Felmingham, D.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?


Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy (2002) 50, 39-47
© 2002 The British Society for Antimicrobial Chemotherapy


Supplement

Molecular characterization of macrolide resistance mechanisms among Streptococcus pneumoniae and Streptococcus pyogenes isolated from the PROTEKT 1999-2000 study

D. J. Farrell*, I. Morrissey, S. Bakker and D. Felmingham

GR Micro Ltd, 7–9 William Road, London NW1 3ER, UK

Abstract

In this study, the distribution of macrolide resistance mechanisms was determined for isolates of Streptococcus pneumoniae and Streptococcus pyogenes obtained from the PROTEKT 1999–2000 study (a global, longitudinal study of the antibacterial susceptibility of bacterial pathogens associated with community-acquired lower respiratory tract infections). The global macrolide resistance mechanism distribution results for 1043 macrolide-resistant S. pneumoniae isolates collected from 25 countries were as follows: 35.3% mef(A), 56.2% erm(B), 6.8% both mef(A) and erm(B), 0.2% erm(A) subclass erm(TR) and 1.5% negative for mechanisms tested. Mechanisms of macrolide resistance were found to vary widely between countries and different geographical regions with mef(A) predominating in North America and erm(B) in Europe. Approximation of genotype from macrolide MIC without molecular determination of the mechanism of resistance resulted in an error of 10.2% (106 isolates). Overall, for 143 macrolide-resistant S. pyogenes isolates, 46.1% of the isolates tested were mef(A), 30.8% were erm(B), 23.1% were erm(A) subclass erm(TR) and no isolates were negative for all the genetic markers tested. Again, the distribution varied widely between countries and geographical regions. This study provides valuable baseline data for the continued monitoring of the evolution of macrolide resistance development in these important respiratory tract pathogens. The ketolide telithromycin retained excellent anti-pneumococcal activity irrespective of macrolide resistance mechanism, having a MIC90 of 0.25, 0.5 and 0.5 mg/L against mef(A), erm(B) and mef(A)+erm(B) macrolide-resistant S. pneumoniae, respectively. It also exhibited potent activity against S. pyogenes that had become resistant to macrolides via either mef(A), (MIC90 0.5 mg/L) or erm(TR), (MIC90 0.03 mg/L).

Footnotes

* Corresponding author. Tel: +44-20-7388-7320; Fax: +44-20-7388-7324; E-mail: D.Farrell{at}grmicro.co.uk


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Med MicrobiolHome page
H. Chardin, K. Yasukawa, N. Nouacer, C. Plainvert, P. Aucouturier, A. Ergani, V. Descroix, R. Toledo-Arenas, J. Azerad, and A. Bouvet
Reduced susceptibility to amoxicillin of oral streptococci following amoxicillin exposure
J. Med. Microbiol., August 1, 2009; 58(8): 1092 - 1097.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.Home page
P. E. Varaldo, M. P. Montanari, and E. Giovanetti
Genetic Elements Responsible for Erythromycin Resistance in Streptococci
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother., February 1, 2009; 53(2): 343 - 353.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Antimicrob ChemotherHome page
S. S. Richter, K. P. Heilmann, C. L. Dohrn, S. E. Beekmann, F. Riahi, J. Garcia-de-Lomas, M. Ferech, H. Goossens, and G. V. Doern
Increasing telithromycin resistance among Streptococcus pyogenes in Europe
J. Antimicrob. Chemother., March 1, 2008; 61(3): 603 - 611.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.Home page
R. Camilli, M. Del Grosso, F. Iannelli, and A. Pantosti
New Genetic Element Carrying the Erythromycin Resistance Determinant erm(TR) in Streptococcus pneumoniae
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother., February 1, 2008; 52(2): 619 - 625.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Antimicrob ChemotherHome page
A. K. Wierzbowski, K. Nichol, N. Laing, T. Hisanaga, A. Nikulin, J. A. Karlowsky, D. J. Hoban, and G. G. Zhanel
Macrolide resistance mechanisms among Streptococcus pneumoniae isolated over 6 years of Canadian Respiratory Organism Susceptibility Study (CROSS) (1998 2004)
J. Antimicrob. Chemother., October 1, 2007; 60(4): 733 - 740.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Antimicrob ChemotherHome page
M. Martin, S. Quilici, T. File, J. Garau, A. Kureishi, and M. Kubin
Cost-effectiveness of empirical prescribing of antimicrobials in community-acquired pneumonia in three countries in the presence of resistance
J. Antimicrob. Chemother., May 1, 2007; 59(5): 977 - 989.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.Home page
D. A. Robinson, J. A. Sutcliffe, W. Tewodros, A. Manoharan, and D. E. Bessen
Evolution and global dissemination of macrolide-resistant group a streptococci.
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother., September 1, 2006; 50(9): 2903 - 2911.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
NEJMHome page
R. L. Guerrant
Cholera--still teaching hard lessons.
N. Engl. J. Med., June 8, 2006; 354(23): 2500 - 2502.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Microbiol.Home page
A. Kronenberg, P. Zucs, S. Droz, and K. Muhlemann
Distribution and Invasiveness of Streptococcus pneumoniae Serotypes in Switzerland, a Country with Low Antibiotic Selection Pressure, from 2001 to 2004.
J. Clin. Microbiol., June 1, 2006; 44(6): 2032 - 2038.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Antimicrob ChemotherHome page
M. T. Halpern, J. K. Schmier, L. M. Snyder, C. Asche, P. W. Sarocco, B. Lavin, R. Nieman, and L. A. Mandell
Meta-analysis of bacterial resistance to macrolides
J. Antimicrob. Chemother., May 1, 2005; 55(5): 748 - 757.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CLIN PEDIATRHome page
S. I. Pelton and M. R. Hammerschlag
Overcoming Current Obstacles in the Management of Bacterial Community-Acquired Pneumonia in Ambulatory Children
Clinical Pediatrics, January 1, 2005; 44(1): 1 - 17.
[PDF]


Home page
CLIN PEDIATRHome page
D. E. Low, M. E. Pichichero, and U. B. Schaad
Optimizing Antibacterial Therapy for Community-Acquired Respiratory Tract Infections in Children in an Era of Bacterial Resistance
Clinical Pediatrics, March 1, 2004; 43(2): 135 - 151.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
J Antimicrob ChemotherHome page
J.-H. Song, H.-H. Chang, J. Y. Suh, K. S. Ko, S.-I. Jung, W. S. Oh, K. R. Peck, N. Y. Lee, Y. Yang, A. Chongthaleong, et al.
Macrolide resistance and genotypic characterization of Streptococcus pneumoniae in Asian countries: a study of the Asian Network for Surveillance of Resistant Pathogens (ANSORP)
J. Antimicrob. Chemother., March 1, 2004; 53(3): 457 - 463.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Antimicrob ChemotherHome page
C. Muller-Serieys, J. Andrews, F. Vacheron, and C. Cantalloube
Tissue kinetics of telithromycin, the first ketolide antibacterial
J. Antimicrob. Chemother., February 1, 2004; 53(2): 149 - 157.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Antimicrob ChemotherHome page
A. Buxbaum, S. Forsthuber, W. Graninger, and A. Georgopoulos
Comparative activity of telithromycin against typical community-acquired respiratory pathogens
J. Antimicrob. Chemother., September 1, 2003; 52(3): 371 - 374.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.