Skip Navigation


JAC Advance Access originally published online on September 20, 2002
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
50/4/577    most recent
dkf182v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (15)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Sandoe, J. A. T.
Right arrow Articles by Wilcox, M. H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Sandoe, J. A. T.
Right arrow Articles by Wilcox, M. H.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?


Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy (2002) 50, 577-582
© 2002 The British Society for Antimicrobial Chemotherapy

Enterococcal intravascular catheter-related bloodstream infection: management and outcome of 61 consecutive cases

Jonathan A. T. Sandoe1,2,*, Ian R. Witherden2, Ho-Kong C. Au-Yeung2, Peter Kite1, Kevin G. Kerr1,2 and Mark H. Wilcox1,2

Department of Microbiology, 1 The General Infirmary at Leeds, 2 University of Leeds, Leeds LS1 3EX, UK

Received 17 May 2002; returned 11 July 2002; revised 12 July 2002; accepted 17 July 2002

Enterococci are an increasingly important cause of intravascular catheter-related bloodstream infection (CRBSI), but the evidence base for treating such cases is limited. Successful antimicrobial treatment of CRBSI while leaving the central venous catheter (CVC) in situ has been reported for some bacteria, such as coagulase-negative staphylococci, but the effectiveness of this approach for treating enterococcal CRBSI is unknown. We aimed to determine the effectiveness of treatment options for enterococcal CRBSI and whether CVC removal is mandatory. Treatment and outcome was determined in a 3 year cohort of patients with enterococcal CRBSI from a university teaching hospital. All episodes of enterococcal bacteraemia during the study (n = 268) were examined to identify the cohort of 61 CRBSIs. Outcomes were determined for various antimicrobial regimens with or without CVC removal. Forty-eight episodes were managed with CVC removal and 13 were managed with the CVC in situ. Forty of 48 (83%) and five of 13 (38%) episodes were cured with the CVC removed or left in situ, respectively. All five episodes cured with the CVC in situ were treated with a cell wall-acting antimicrobial plus an aminoglycoside. This antimicrobial combination was significantly more effective than either ampicillin or vancomycin monotherapy (P < 0.05), or antimicrobials to which isolates were not susceptible (P < 0.01) when the CVC remained in situ. We conclude that enterococcal CRBSI can be treated successfully without CVC removal. The combination of a cell wall-acting antimicrobial with an aminoglycoside was the most effective regimen when the CVC remained in situ in this small group of patients. Although CVC removal was associated with a high cure rate, it did not guarantee treatment success.

Keywords: Enterococcus, intravascular catheter, bloodstream infection

* Correspondence address. Department of Microbiology, Old Medical School, University of Leeds, Leeds LS2 9JT, UK. Tel: +44-113-343-5634; Fax: +44-113-343-5638; E-mail: micjs{at}leeds.ac.uk


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Antimicrob ChemotherHome page
J. A. T. Sandoe, J. Wysome, A. P. West, J. Heritage, and M. H. Wilcox
Measurement of ampicillin, vancomycin, linezolid and gentamicin activity against enterococcal biofilms
J. Antimicrob. Chemother., April 1, 2006; 57(4): 767 - 770.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.Home page
I. I. Raad, H. A. Hanna, M. Boktour, G. Chaiban, R. Y. Hachem, T. Dvorak, R. Lewis, and B. E. Murray
Vancomycin-Resistant Enterococcus faecium: Catheter Colonization, esp Gene, and Decreased Susceptibility to Antibiotics in Biofilm
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother., December 1, 2005; 49(12): 5046 - 5050.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Antimicrob ChemotherHome page
N. P. Wiederhold, E. A. Coyle, I. I. Raad, R. A. Prince, and R. E. Lewis
Antibacterial activity of linezolid and vancomycin in an in vitro pharmacodynamic model of Gram-positive catheter-related bacteraemia
J. Antimicrob. Chemother., May 1, 2005; 55(5): 792 - 795.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Med MicrobiolHome page
J. A.T. Sandoe, I. R. Witherden, J. H. Cove, J. Heritage, and M. H. Wilcox
Correlation between enterococcal biofilm formation in vitro and medical-device-related infection potential in vivo
J. Med. Microbiol., July 1, 2003; 52(7): 547 - 550.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.