Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Supplementary data
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by The Campylobacter Sentinel Surveillance Scheme Collaborators,
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by The Campylobacter Sentinel Surveillance Scheme Collaborators,
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?


Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy (2002) 50, 561-568
© 2002 The British Society for Antimicrobial Chemotherapy

Ciprofloxacin resistance in Campylobacter jejuni: case–case analysis as a tool for elucidating risks at home and abroad

The Campylobacter Sentinel Surveillance Scheme Collaborators*,§

Received 11 March 2002; returned 14 May 2002; revised 10 June 2002; accepted 15 July 2002

Objective: To determine factors independently associated with the acquisition of a ciprofloxacin-resistant Campylobacter jejuni infection.

Methods: Self-completion questionnaires were used to collect clinical, demographic and exposure data from cases of campylobacter infection reported to a sentinel surveillance scheme in England and Wales. Isolates from those cases were referred to the Public Health Laboratory Service Campylobacter Reference Unit for speciation, subtyping and antimicrobial resistance testing. Cases infected with a ciprofloxacin-resistant C. jejuni were compared with cases infected with a sensitive strain using case–case analysis. Single risk variable analysis and logistic regression analysis were employed. The analysis was restricted by travel status to control for the confounding effect of foreign travel.

Results and conclusion: Over half (55%) of the campylobacter infections acquired abroad were resistant to ciprofloxacin, compared with 10% of UK-acquired strains [relative risk 5.23; 95% confidence interval (CI) 4.58–5.96]. For travel-associated cases, ciprofloxacin-resistant infections were independently associated with travel to Spain [odds ratio (OR) 6.87; 95% CI 3.52–13.38], Portugal (OR 22.40; 95% CI 4.36–114.99) or Cyprus (OR 11.74; 95% CI 1.28–108.02), and the consumption of chicken (OR 4.95; 95% CI 2.12–11.56) or bottled water (OR 3.70; 95% CI 1.69–8.10). Indigenous cases infected with a ciprofloxacin-resistant strain were more likely to report the consumption of pre-cooked cold meats (OR 2.13; 95% CI 1.44–3.13). The risk of acquiring a ciprofloxacin-resistant campylobacter infection was strongly associated with foreign travel. Restricting the analyses by travel status revealed different sets of risk exposures for acquiring a resistant C. jejuni strain, suggesting that different intervention strategies will be required.

* Correspondence address. Dr Sarah J. O’Brien, Consultant Epidemiologist, Head of Gastrointestinal Diseases Division, PHLS Communicable Disease Surveillance Centre, 61 Colindale Avenue, London NW9 5EQ, UK. Tel: +44-20-8200-6868 ext. 4422; Fax: +44-20-8200-7868; E-mail: sobrien{at}phls.org.uk

§ The Campylobacter Sentinel Surveillance Scheme Collaborators are listed in the Acknowledgements.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Postgrad. Med. J.Home page
A J Kent, L Farouk, J Main, and J M Hoare
Antibiotic-resistant Campylobacter: an increasing problem
Postgrad. Med. J., February 1, 2008; 84(988): 106 - 108.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Antimicrob ChemotherHome page
K. E. Dingle, L. Clarke, and I. C. J. W. Bowler
Ciprofloxacin resistance among human Campylobacter isolates 1991-2004: an update
J. Antimicrob. Chemother., August 1, 2005; 56(2): 435 - 437.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.Home page
T. J. Humphrey, F. Jorgensen, J. A. Frost, H. Wadda, G. Domingue, N. C. Elviss, D. J. Griggs, and L. J. V. Piddock
Prevalence and Subtypes of Ciprofloxacin-Resistant Campylobacter spp. in Commercial Poultry Flocks before, during, and after Treatment with Fluoroquinolones
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother., February 1, 2005; 49(2): 690 - 698.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Antimicrob ChemotherHome page
J. R. Greig
Quinolone resistance in Campylobacter
J. Antimicrob. Chemother., March 1, 2003; 51(3): 740 - 742.
[Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.