Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (40)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Aucken, H. M.
Right arrow Articles by Johnson, A. P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Aucken, H. M.
Right arrow Articles by Johnson, A. P.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?


Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy (2002) 50, 171-175
© 2002 The British Society for Antimicrobial Chemotherapy

A new UK strain of epidemic methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (EMRSA-17) resistant to multiple antibiotics

Hazel M. Aucken1, Mark Ganner1, Stephen Murchan1,*, Barry D. Cookson1 and Alan P. Johnson2,§

1 Laboratory of Hospital Infection and 2 Antibiotic Resistance Monitoring and Reference Laboratory, Central Public Health Laboratory, Colindale, London NW9 5HT, UK

Received 21 January 2002; returned 5 March 2002; revised 24 April 2002; accepted 16 May 2002

An extensive outbreak in a hospital on the south coast of England in 2000, involving a multi-resistant strain of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) phenotypically similar to a strain periodically seen in several hospitals in that region since 1996, prompted a study to characterize the strain and determine the extent of its spread. Sixty-nine isolates with related phage patterns obtained between 1997 and 2000 from 19 hospitals were selected for study. Of these, 55 isolates had an identical PFGE profile (designated F1), and eight shared five other PFGE profiles (designated F2–F6), which differed from that of F1 by no more than three bands and were considered related. Six isolates had PFGE profiles that differed from F1–F6 by 9–18 bands and were considered to be distinct strains. The 63 isolates of profiles F1–F6 were considered to comprise a single strain and were phenotypically identical, being urease positive and resistant to multiple antibiotics including methicillin, ciprofloxacin, erythromycin, fusidic acid, rifampicin, gentamicin, kanamycin, neomycin, streptomycin and tetracycline, with or without high- or low-level mupirocin resistance. Borderline resistance to teicoplanin was also commonly noted. All but one of these 63 isolates contained the gene sea, with five also carrying the genes seg and sei, and two carrying tst. The isolates of this strain had been referred from 13 different hospitals, seven of which were on or near the south coast, four from London, one from the Midlands and one from the north of England. The isolates were thus considered to comprise an epidemic MRSA (EMRSA) strain, which has been designated EMRSA-17. The six non-EMRSA-17 isolates identified in the study were sensitive to fusidic acid and rifampicin, and came from six geographically diverse hospitals including three in Northern Ireland.

* Present address. National Disease Surveillance Centre, Dublin, Ireland.

§ Corresponding author. Tel: +44-20-8200-4400, ext. 4237; Fax: +44-20-8358-3292; E-mail: ajohnson{at}phls.org.uk


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Antimicrob ChemotherHome page
F. K. Gould, R. Brindle, P. R. Chadwick, A. P. Fraise, S. Hill, D. Nathwani, G. L. Ridgway, M. J. Spry, R. E. Warren, and on behalf of the MRSA Working Party of the British
Guidelines (2008) for the prophylaxis and treatment of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) infections in the United Kingdom
J. Antimicrob. Chemother., May 1, 2009; 63(5): 849 - 861.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Microbiol.Home page
O. Dauwalder, G. Lina, G. Durand, M. Bes, H. Meugnier, V. Jarlier, B. Coignard, F. Vandenesch, J. Etienne, and F. Laurent
Epidemiology of Invasive Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Clones Collected in France in 2006 and 2007
J. Clin. Microbiol., October 1, 2008; 46(10): 3454 - 3458.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Antimicrob ChemotherHome page
C. G. Gemmell, D. I. Edwards, A. P. Fraise, F. K. Gould, G. L. Ridgway, R. E. Warren, and on behalf of the Joint Working Party of the Britis
Guidelines for the prophylaxis and treatment of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) infections in the UK
J. Antimicrob. Chemother., April 1, 2006; 57(4): 589 - 608.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.Home page
M. L. Embleton, S. P. Nair, W. Heywood, D. C. Menon, B. D. Cookson, and M. Wilson
Development of a Novel Targeting System for Lethal Photosensitization of Antibiotic-Resistant Strains of Staphylococcus aureus
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother., September 1, 2005; 49(9): 3690 - 3696.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Antimicrob ChemotherHome page
A. P. Johnson, A. Pearson, and G. Duckworth
Surveillance and epidemiology of MRSA bacteraemia in the UK
J. Antimicrob. Chemother., September 1, 2005; 56(3): 455 - 462.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.Home page
D. Jabes, G. Candiani, G. Romano, C. Brunati, S. Riva, and M. Cavaleri
Efficacy of Dalbavancin against Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus in the Rat Granuloma Pouch Infection Model
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother., April 1, 2004; 48(4): 1118 - 1123.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Microbiol.Home page
Y.-C. Huang, L.-H. Su, T.-L. Wu, C.-E. Liu, T.-G. Young, P.-Y. Chen, P.-R. Hseuh, and T.-Y. Lin
Molecular Epidemiology of Clinical Isolates of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus in Taiwan
J. Clin. Microbiol., January 1, 2004; 42(1): 307 - 310.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br J AnaesthHome page
K. J. Hardy, P. M. Hawkey, F. Gao, and B. A. Oppenheim
Methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus in the critically ill
Br. J. Anaesth., January 1, 2004; 92(1): 121 - 130.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arch. Dis. Child.Home page
D Dobie and J Gray
Fusidic acid resistance in Staphylococcus aureus
Arch. Dis. Child., January 1, 2004; 89(1): 74 - 77.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Microbiol.Home page
L. K. McDougal, C. D. Steward, G. E. Killgore, J. M. Chaitram, S. K. McAllister, and F. C. Tenover
Pulsed-Field Gel Electrophoresis Typing of Oxacillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Isolates from the United States: Establishing a National Database
J. Clin. Microbiol., November 1, 2003; 41(11): 5113 - 5120.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Antimicrob ChemotherHome page
R. J. Manuel, A. Tuck, A. Lowes, and A. Pallett
Detection of teicoplanin resistance in UK EMRSA-17 strains
J. Antimicrob. Chemother., December 1, 2002; 50(6): 1089 - 1090.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Antimicrob ChemotherHome page
A. P. Johnson and N. Woodford
Glycopeptide-resistant Staphylococcus aureus
J. Antimicrob. Chemother., November 1, 2002; 50(5): 621 - 623.
[Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.