Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Felmingham, D.
Right arrow Articles by Brown, D. F. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Felmingham, D.
Right arrow Articles by Brown, D. F. J.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy (2001) 48, 81-85
© 2001 The British Society for Antimicrobial Chemotherapy

Supplement

Instrumentation in antimicrobial susceptibility testing

David Felminghama,* and Derek F. J. Brownb

a GR Micro Ltd, 7–9 William Road, London NW1 3ER; b Clinical Microbiology and Public Health Laboratory, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Hills Road, Cambridge CB2 2QW, UK

Abstract

Studies in the 1960s demonstrated the problems of variability in susceptibility testing methods, especially those affecting the performance of disc diffusion procedures. These studies made apparent the need for standardization and resulted in more clearly defined performance limits for growth medium, incubation conditions, inoculum concentration, disc content for diffusion methods, the setting of interpretative MIC breakpoints and the establishment of quality control parameters. More recently, there has been a growing interest in the use of instrumentation for reading disc diffusion tests and the endpoints of agar or broth dilution MIC determinations. Instrumentation ranges in complexity from the simple optical reading of zones of inhibition or growth endpoints, requiring operator interpretation, to more sophisticated devices for reading, recording and ‘expert system’ analysis of results with interfacing of instruments to laboratory information management systems. Some of the more developed systems are fully automated and can also identify the organisms tested. The pressure to reduce labour costs and provide results earlier favours the use of more automated systems whilst the requirement for resistance surveillance provides impetus for the use of systems that provide quantitative results and electronic data handling.

Notes

* Corresponding author. Tel: +44-20-7388-7320; Fax: +44-20-7388-7324; E-mail: d.felmingham{at}grmicro.co.uk


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 J Med MicrobiolHome page
E. Torres, R. Villanueva, and G. Bou
Comparison of different methods of determining {beta}-lactam susceptibility in clinical strains of Pseudomonas aeruginosa
J. Med. Microbiol., May 1, 2009; 58(5): 625 - 629.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J. Clin. Microbiol.Home page
H. S. Sader, T. R. Fritsche, and R. N. Jones
Accuracy of Three Automated Systems (MicroScan WalkAway, VITEK, and VITEK 2) for Susceptibility Testing of Pseudomonas aeruginosa against Five Broad-Spectrum Beta-Lactam Agents.
J. Clin. Microbiol., March 1, 2006; 44(3): 1101 - 1104.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J. Clin. Microbiol.Home page
R. Canton, E. Loza, M. Del Carmen Conejo, F. Baquero, and L. Martinez-Martinez
Quality Control for {beta}-Lactam Susceptibility Testing with a Well-Defined Collection of Enterobacteriaceae and Pseudomonas aeruginosa Strains in Spain
J. Clin. Microbiol., May 1, 2003; 41(5): 1912 - 1918.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.