Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (6)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lawrenson, R. A.
Right arrow Articles by Logie, J. W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Lawrenson, R. A.
Right arrow Articles by Logie, J. W.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy (2001) 48, 895-901
© 2001 The British Society for Antimicrobial Chemotherapy

Antibiotic failure in the treatment of urinary tract infections in young women

Ross A. Lawrenson,* and John W. Logie

Postgraduate Medical School, University of Surrey, Stirling House, Surrey Research Park, Guildford GU2 7DJ, UK

Urinary tract infections (UTIs) are a common problem in young women. The aim of this study was to describe the pattern of antibiotic prescribing to young women presenting with new UTIs and to investigate the proportion who required further treatment if prescribed antibiotics. A secondary aim was to investigate whether the likelihood of treatment failure varied between different antibiotics and, in the case of trimethoprim (the antibiotic most frequently prescribed for UTIs) between prescriptions of different duration. The study included all women aged 15–44 years registered on the UK General Practice Research Database. All diagnoses of UTI or cystitis with an associated prescription for an antibiotic were identified. A further prescription of an antibiotic within 28 days was taken to indicate failure of the initial treatment. Overall, 14% of 75045 newly treated patients with UTI received a second antibiotic within 28 days. Older women, aged 35–44, pregnant patients and those with diabetes were significantly more likely to require further treatment. With trimethoprim as the reference antibiotic, after 28 days patients prescribed amoxicillin were significantly more likely to require a second course of antibiotics. Those prescribed co-trimoxazole were significantly less likely to require further treatment. In each case the difference in failure rate was small and may be of little clinical significance. There was no significant difference between trimethoprim and nitrofurantoin, norfloxacin, ciprofloxacin or the cephalosporins. Three-day prescriptions for trimethoprim appeared as effective as those for 5 or 7 days. This study gives some observational evidence of the effectiveness of antibiotic prescribing in young women with UTIs and shows that between 12% and 16% of patients will return within 28 days for further treatment, irrespective of the antibiotic prescribed initially.

* Corresponding author. Tel: +44-1483-302239; Fax: +44-1483-300359; E-mail: r.lawrenson{at}surrey.ac.uk


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Diabetes CareHome page
C. Schneeberger, R. P. Stolk, J. H. DeVries, P. M. Schneeberger, R. M. Herings, and S. E. Geerlings
Differences in the Pattern of Antibiotic Prescription Profile and Recurrence Rate for Possible Urinary Tract Infections in Women With and Without Diabetes
Diabetes Care, July 1, 2008; 31(7): 1380 - 1385.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Appl. Environ. Microbiol.Home page
M. D. Adjei, T. M. Heinze, J. Deck, J. P. Freeman, A. J. Williams, and J. B. Sutherland
Transformation of the Antibacterial Agent Norfloxacin by Environmental Mycobacteria
Appl. Envir. Microbiol., September 1, 2006; 72(9): 5790 - 5793.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.