Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (24)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Boyle-Vavra, S.
Right arrow Articles by Daum, R. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Boyle-Vavra, S.
Right arrow Articles by Daum, R. S.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy (2001) 48, 617-625
© 2001 The British Society for Antimicrobial Chemotherapy

Development of vancomycin and lysostaphin resistance in a methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus isolate

Susan Boyle-Vavraa,*, Roberta B. Careyb and Robert S. Dauma

a Department of Pediatrics, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA; b Department of Pathology, Loyola University Medical Center, Maywood, IL, USA

Glycopeptide resistance in Staphylococcus aureus is poorly understood. The diversity of change documented in cell walls of clinical glycopeptide-intermediate S. aureus (GISA) isolates is evidence that a single genetic or biochemical change cannot account for resistance in all isolates described to date. Therefore, identification of new GISA clinical isolates provides an opportunity to gain insight into the range of adaptive strategies employed by staphylococci to survive in the presence of glycopeptides. In April 1999, a GISA isolate was obtained from the blood of a 63-year-old dialysis patient in Illinois. This isolate was one of six clonally identical MRSA isolates (A–F) serially obtained from the blood of this patient who was receiving vancomycin therapy. All isolates were resistant to oxacillin (MIC > 256 mg/L). The initial isolate had an MIC of vancomycin of 1 mg/L. However, the presence of a subpopulation that could grow in the presence of 5 mg/L of vancomycin indicated that this isolate was predisposed to the acquisition of the GISA phenotype (MIC of vancomycin 10–12 mg/L), which occurred 13 days later, associated with an increased MIC of the endopeptidase lysostaphin and slightly increased cell wall thickness. The first and last isolates in the series, A and F, resisted killing when incubated in vancomycin 2 mg/L, resisted autolysis when incubated in Triton X-100 and had a decreased expression of a c. 116 kDa autolytic band, properties that were different from glycopeptide-susceptible control isolates. Lysostaphin resistance was not accompanied by alterations in the peptidoglycan pentaglycine cross-bridge or a decrease in oxacillin MIC. These data, when taken together with the demonstration of increased cross-linking in isolate F compared with isolate A, demonstrate that vancomycin resistance in these isolates probably occurred by a mechanism different from that of other GISA isolates described to date.

* Correspondence address. MC 6054, 5841 S. Maryland Avenue, Chicago, IL 60637, USA. Tel: +1-773-702-6176; Fax: +1-773-702-1196; E-mail: sboyleva{at}midway.uchicago.edu


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
MicrobiologyHome page
P. D. Stapleton, S. Shah, K. Ehlert, Y. Hara, and P. W. Taylor
The beta-lactam-resistance modifier (-)-epicatechin gallate alters the architecture of the cell wall of Staphylococcus aureus
Microbiology, July 1, 2007; 153(7): 2093 - 2103.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.Home page
S. Gardete, S. W. Wu, S. Gill, and A. Tomasz
Role of VraSR in Antibiotic Resistance and Antibiotic-Induced Stress Response in Staphylococcus aureus.
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother., October 1, 2006; 50(10): 3424 - 3434.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.Home page
N. McCallum, H. Karauzum, R. Getzmann, M. Bischoff, P. Majcherczyk, B. Berger-Bachi, and R. Landmann
In Vivo Survival of Teicoplanin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus and Fitness Cost of Teicoplanin Resistance.
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother., July 1, 2006; 50(7): 2352 - 2360.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.Home page
S. Utaida, R. F. Pfeltz, R. K. Jayaswal, and B. J. Wilkinson
Autolytic Properties of Glycopeptide-Intermediate Staphylococcus aureus Mu50.
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother., April 1, 2006; 50(4): 1541 - 1545.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Antimicrob ChemotherHome page
G. Sakoulas, H. S. Gold, R. A. Cohen, L. Venkataraman, R. C. Moellering, and G. M. Eliopoulos
Effects of prolonged vancomycin administration on methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) in a patient with recurrent bacteraemia
J. Antimicrob. Chemother., April 1, 2006; 57(4): 699 - 704.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.Home page
S. Yin, R. S. Daum, and S. Boyle-Vavra
VraSR Two-Component Regulatory System and Its Role in Induction of pbp2 and vraSR Expression by Cell Wall Antimicrobials in Staphylococcus aureus
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother., January 1, 2006; 50(1): 336 - 343.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.Home page
C. M. Kusuma and J. F. Kokai-Kun
Comparison of Four Methods for Determining Lysostaphin Susceptibility of Various Strains of Staphylococcus aureus
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother., August 1, 2005; 49(8): 3256 - 3263.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.Home page
G. Sakoulas, G. M. Eliopoulos, V. G. Fowler Jr., R. C. Moellering Jr., R. P. Novick, N. Lucindo, M. R. Yeaman, and A. S. Bayer
Reduced Susceptibility of Staphylococcus aureus to Vancomycin and Platelet Microbicidal Protein Correlates with Defective Autolysis and Loss of Accessory Gene Regulator (agr) Function
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother., July 1, 2005; 49(7): 2687 - 2692.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.Home page
J. L. Koehl, A. Muthaiyan, R. K. Jayaswal, K. Ehlert, H. Labischinski, and B. J. Wilkinson
Cell Wall Composition and Decreased Autolytic Activity and Lysostaphin Susceptibility of Glycopeptide-Intermediate Staphylococcus aureus
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother., October 1, 2004; 48(10): 3749 - 3757.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.Home page
S. Boyle-Vavra, M. Challapalli, and R. S. Daum
Resistance to Autolysis in Vancomycin-Selected Staphylococcus aureus Isolates Precedes Vancomycin-Intermediate Resistance
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother., June 1, 2003; 47(6): 2036 - 2039.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.Home page
S. Boyle-Vavra, S. Yin, M. Challapalli, and R. S. Daum
Transcriptional Induction of the Penicillin-Binding Protein 2 Gene in Staphylococcus aureus by Cell Wall-Active Antibiotics Oxacillin and Vancomycin
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother., March 1, 2003; 47(3): 1028 - 1036.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Appl. Environ. Microbiol.Home page
C. T. D. Price, V. K. Singh, R. K. Jayaswal, B. J. Wilkinson, and J. E. Gustafson
Pine Oil Cleaner-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus: Reduced Susceptibility to Vancomycin and Oxacillin and Involvement of SigB
Appl. Envir. Microbiol., November 1, 2002; 68(11): 5417 - 5421.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.Home page
P. J. Petersen, P. A. Bradford, W. J. Weiss, T. M. Murphy, P. E. Sum, and S. J. Projan
In Vitro and In Vivo Activities of Tigecycline (GAR-936), Daptomycin, and Comparative Antimicrobial Agents against Glycopeptide-Intermediate Staphylococcus aureus and Other Resistant Gram-Positive Pathogens
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother., August 1, 2002; 46(8): 2595 - 2601.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.